| Archives |
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| Politics and Elections - January, 2006 |
|---|
| Tuesday, January 31, 2006
|
|---|
| Introducing Associate Justice Samuel Alito
| | By the most partisan vote in the modern era, the Senate has confirmed Samuel Alito
to the Supreme Court. With this confirmation, I point to two questions which loom large on the horizon. One, will Justice Kennedy, who
is now the only swing vote, move to the left to try to offset this new, larger conservative voting bloc on the Court?
And the really big, really huge question, will another vacancy open up on the court before a Democrat takes up residence in the White House?
In light of the ages of each Justice now seated, it is highly likely that if an opening does occur, it will be among the liberals. Imagine
the fight if, say, Justice Stevens is no longer on the court sometime in the next 2 years. This Alito confirmation process will be like a
cap gun battle by comparison. One more conservative on the Court and America will fundamentally change.
Week before last, Election Projection's Weekly Poll asked how many senators would vote to confirm Alito.
Associated with it was a contest in which my readers ventured their predictions of how many
Republicans, Democrats, and Jeffords would vote yea. The actual yea vote was 54 GOP, 4 DEMs, 0 Jeffords.
Congratulations to Ken Adair who got very close to the actual totals. He correctly predicted 54 GOP and 0 Jeffords. His prediction of
5 DEMs was only one off. Nice going, Ken, you're the winner!
Honorable Mention: Long time reader and commenter Tim J predicted 54 GOP, 6 DEMs, and 0 Jeffords.
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:35pm 01/31/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Next preview coming soon...
| The 2006 preview for Nebraska will be up some time tomorrow.
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:20am 01/31/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Black republicans - serious force in 2006?
| With the candidacies of Ken Blackwell and Lynn Swann for governor in Ohio and Pennsylvania, respectively, African-American
Republicans are assuming a higher profile in this year's elections. And you can add the Senate bid of Maryland's Lt. Governor Michael Steele
to the mix as well. What is the significance of these candidacies on the political trends in this country? Is the GOP beginning to offer real
and viable alternatives to the Democratic Party for blacks to consider? Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling
Institute, examines the gubernatorial candidates and wonders about
the willingness of both African-Americans and white conservatives to vote for a black Republican. In order to be successful, these men must
be successful in gaining a strong portion of each. This is a very interesting read, and I'm curious to get the reactions of my readers.
So make sure to go read the whole article and come back here to add your thoughts on it to the comment thread of this post.
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:15am 01/31/06 ::
link
|
|
| Monday, January 30, 2006
|
|---|
| Poll: Does the Hamas victory make our job harder?
| The latest edition of Election Projection's Weekly Poll is up. This week the question asks what your opinion is
of last week's surprising victory by Hamas in the Palestinian elections. Does this mean we're going to have a more difficult struggle
in defeating terrorism? Or will it have little impact? Enter your answer in the right sidebar and add your comments here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:05pm 01/30/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| January senator scorecard
| SurveyUSA has the
January edition of their 50-state
senator job approval polls up. Good news for Democrats. Of the 17 senators with the lowest net approval,
14 are Republicans. That's a remarkable statistic. However, I wouldn't get too happy if I were a Dem
right now. A whole lot can change in nine months.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:50am 01/30/06 ::
link
|
| Thursday, January 26, 2006
|
|---|
| "Under the big Montana sky" - 2006 preview
| | Senate Race: There are three keys words that will be instramental in determining
whether GOP incumbent Conrad Burns gets to keep his office in the U.S. Capitol: Abramoff, Abramoff, and, well,
Abramoff. Disgraced and indicted, lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his political escapades are the newest
hope on which Democrats are pinning their chances in this year's congressional elections. Perhaps no other
elected official's fortunes are more closely tied to
the outcome of the Abramoff story than this Montana senator.
If the story sticks and Burns is as involved as the evidence seems to indicate, he may be as good as gone.
However, I don't think there will be as big a bruhaha about this as Democrats hope, and if the Senator can effectively
spin the fact that he returned the money
he received from Abramoff and associates, he should come out ok. A key indicator to watch will be his
job approval numbers going forward. In Survey USA's latest poll, conducted in December before the news of
Burns divesting himself of the tainted funds, shows him
slipping into the mid 40's.
He must get those numbers back above 50 to have much of a chance at re-election.
On a positive note for the incumbent, Burns was able to defeat the perfect Democrat candidate in now-Governor
Brian Schweitzer in 2000 - even while many GOP Senate incumbents were losing - and this time he will not face such a
juggernaught. Whom he will face is uncertain, and the competition between two or more legitimate Democrat
challengers insures a primary battle which could weaken the Democrat nominee. Vying for the party spot on the
ballot are John Morrison, Montana State Auditor, Jon Tester, Montana State Senator, and former Montana State
Representative Paul Richards.
Given The Blogging Caesar's hunch that Abramoff will not generate the political spoils which the Democrats
expect, I'm giving this race to the incumbent for now. If I'm wrong on Abramoff, this will be one of the first
to go the other way.
Governor and House Races: The aforementioned Governor Schweitzer is not up for re-election this year,
and Montana's at-large House position is comfortably GOP.
Check out more on Montana here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 4:20pm 01/26/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| How will they vote?
| | In advance of Judge Alito's ever-nearing Senate confirmation vote,
California Yankee is rounding up the
announced and indicated positions of all the senators he can find. He's updating them as more senators make
their voting intentions known.
Update: As if it wasn't already, Alito's confirmation is now
all but certain.
posted by Scott Elliott at 3:25pm 01/26/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Show me Missouri" - 2006 preview
| | Senate Race: Republican Jim Talent joined the Senate during the historical mid-term
elections in 2002. Running in this most dependable bellweather state, Talent narrowly defeated Jean Carnahan
in a special election that year. Carnahan had been appointed to fill the seat after her husband Mel's death
during the 2000 campaign. Acting Missouri Governor Roger B. Wilson announced after Mel Carnahan's tragic accident
that he would appoint Jean to the position if Mel were to win the election posthumously. (Because the
tragedy occurred to soon before the election to make any changes, Mel's name appeared on the ballot.)
Four years removed from that period of unusual circumstances, Talent is seeking re-election to a first full term.
In Missouri, as is fitting a bellweather, the partisan divide is very close. Some of the closest races in
recent memory have come from Missouri - Talent himself won by only 22,000 votes out of over 2 million in 2002 - and
this one promises to be another one. The Democrat picked to run against him is State Auditor Claire McCaskill.
Having a prominent opponent who has already won a statewide election makes Talent's task uncertain at best.
His approval ratings
have been right at 50%, suggesting he is vulnerable. However, disapproval has dropped below 40%. The
Blogging Caesar thinks Missourians will view Talent as "good enough" and re-elect him by a close but comfortable
margin over McCaskill. It'll be a weak GOP hold, say 52%-48%.
Governor and House Races: Republican Governor Matt Blunt's next election is 2008. Missouri's
9 House delegates are all safe in 2006.
Check out more on Missouri here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 2:40pm 01/26/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| President Kerry? If the election were today
| | One of the building blocks for my highly successful
projection formula in 2004 was a heavy dependence on
the job approval of the president. The correlation
between a sitting president's last job approval rating before Election Day as determined by Gallup and his eventual
vote total is startling.
Survey USA is a well-respected polling organization, and they periodically post polling results on a state-by-state
basis. Earlier this month, they conducted a poll to determine Bush's job approval in each state. The
results, when viewed in the light of correlation I've just illustrated, would surely make one Senator John Kerry
wish the election were today instead of 15 months ago.
Of the 50 states, Bush reaches 50% job approval in only 11, representing a paltry 85 electoral votes.
Even if you give Bush the benefit of the doubt in states where Bush's job approval is 47% or better, he still
would only end up with 115 EVs. That leaves 423 for Kerry, and that's a landslide. On the other hand,
it is interesting that, amid the Abu Graib scandal in May of 2004, my projection showed
Kerry would win 337 EVs.
Perhaps not a landslide, but a substantial victory nonetheless.
I believe there is an old saying that fits here very well. "Timing is everything." When it
comes to the re-election of George W. Bush, truer words were never spoken.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:40pm 01/26/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, January 25, 2006
|
|---|
| "Strolling down Mississippi's magnolia way" - 2006 preview
| | Senate Race: The GOP would probably have held on to this seat even if Trent Lott had decided to step down.
Since he's going make a run at a fourth term - "Mississippi is hurting and needs help" - this seat is as safe as they come. Speculation
had been swirling around Lott's possible retirement. Some thought discontent with the Bush administration and the current GOP Senate
leadership along with the personal property loss Lott experienced in the wake of the hurricanes last year would prompt the former Senate Majority
Leader to call it quits. Apparently, the needs of Mississippi, as he puts it, won out. The Blogging Caesar is happy about that
and happy to call this race a strong GOP hold.
Governor and House Races: Republican Haley Barbour is not up for re-election until next year, and Mississippi's evenly divided
House delegation will easily remain 2 DEM and 2 GOP.
Check out more on Mississippi here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:30am 01/25/06 ::
link
|
| Tuesday, January 24, 2006
|
|---|
| An ominous development
| | Judge Samuel Alito has been cleared by the Senator judiciary
committee and his nomination to the Supreme Court will soon get a full Senate vote. All indications are that the Democrats will not
employ the filibuster to block that vote, and there are more than enough GOP senators to ensure Alito's confirmation. Yea! We won!
Right? Yes, staunch conservatives will get one more of their own on the Supreme Court, and that's a good thing. However, what
disturbs me is that Alito will be confirmed only because the GOP has a majority in the Senate. If this current crop of Democratic senators
numbered 55 instead of the GOP, Alito would not have gotten out of committee. And even if he had, the Democrats would have rejected his
nomination in the full Senate vote. (Currently only 1 of 23 Demcratic senators who have publicly stated their intent says he will vote for Alito)
By all accounts, Samuel Alito is supremely qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. No one questions his legal fortitude, and there are
no skeletons rattling in his closet. Yet every single Democrat on the judiciary committee voted against him, and it appears just
about all Democratic senators will vote no when his nomination comes before the full Senate. They are not voting against his qualifications,
but against his ideology. It is scary to me to think that Senate Democrats are now setting the precedent that Supreme Court nominees must
meet the ideological approval of the opposition party to gain their vote. Conservatives can only thank God that we are in the majority
and pray that we maintain that majority. And Democrats need to pray, should a Democrat succeed President Bush, that the Republicans
don't impose their will on their guy (or gal) the way Biden, Kennedy, et al, are doing to Bush.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:25pm 01/24/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Way to go, Canada!!
| Looks like our neighbor to the north might be
coming to their senses.
| Stephen Harper and his Conservative Party won national
elections Monday and ended 13 years of Liberal rule, giving Canada a leader who was expected to move the country
to the right on social and economic issues and bolster ties with the United States.
[...]
The Conservative victory [..] shifted the traditionally liberal
country to the right on socio-economic issues such as health care, taxation, abortion and gay marriage.
Many Canadians had grown weary of the broken promises and corruption scandals under the Liberal Party and were
apparently willing to give Harper the benefit of doubt, despite fears the 46-year-old economist was too extreme
in his views opposing abortion and gay marriage.
During the campaign, Harper pledged to cut the red tape in social welfare programs, lower the national sales
tax from 7 percent to 5 percent and grant more autonomy and federal funding to Canada's 13 provinces and
territories.
|
On the other hand, it's probably just a fluke.
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:40am 01/24/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, January 23, 2006
|
|---|
| Poll: Quest for the party nominations
| This week's EP Weekly Poll takes a look at possible party nominees for the Democrats and the Republicans. Will
Senator John McCain finally get the GOP nod? Will former Co-President and current Senator Hillary Clinton win the chance to regain
the Presidency all for herself? Answer the poll and discuss your thoughts on the major party nominees in the comment section of this post.
posted by Scott Elliott at 5:45pm 01/23/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Housekeeping
| | Just wanted to give everyone a head's up about some things here at Election Projection. First, my wife and I have
been helping her parents get packed up these last couple weeks - they're moving to Oregon - and we are busy again today. As a result,
the state previews have slowed. The next preview, Mississippi, will be up some time tomorrow (it may be late tomorrow).
Second, the Alito confirmation contest
will wrap up today at 5pm EST. I'll insert a marker in the comment thread, and only predictions entered
above that marker will count. If you haven't participated, click here:
to enter your prediction. And, if you haven't already, be sure to cast your vote in the poll related to Alito on the right sidebar.
Finally, a new poll will be up some time later tonight. After the release of a
McCain vs. Hillary poll just recently, I think I'll
conduct a similar poll here at Election Projection.
Update: Alito contest is now closed. I'll post the closest prediction after the vote.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:15am 01/23/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| A dark, dark anniversary
| Yesterday marked 33 years
since the legalization of the murder of innocents. My prayers are with all the vast multitudes of women who carry the terrible
emotional scars of abortion. May the killing soon end.
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:20am 01/23/06 ::
link
|
| Friday, January 20, 2006
|
|---|
| Iraqi election results
| Looks like the best result for peace
in Iraq has come out of the Iraqi elections held last month. Shiites were unable to gain a working majority and now must cooperate with
minority factions, Kurds and Sunnis, in governing the country.
The Shiite United Iraqi Alliance captured 128 of the 275 seats in the Dec. 15
election, down from the 146 it won in January 2005 balloting, said commission official Safwat Rasheed. It needed 138 to rule without
partners.
A Sunni ticket, the Iraqi Accordance Front, won 44 seats. Another Sunni coalition headed by Saleh al-Mutlaq finished with 11 seats,
Rasheed said. A few other Sunnis won seats on other tickets.
That will give the Sunni Arabs a bigger voice in the legislature than they had in the outgoing assembly, which included only 17 from
the community forming the backbone of the insurgency. Many Sunnis had boycotted the January vote.
|
The fact that more Sunnis voted in the election this time can only be interpreted as good news for peace and bad news for the insurgency.
They will continue their senseless killing, but they must be feeling a growing sense of futility. The Iraqi people, by a vast majority,
are choosing peace and democracy over violence and strife. That's good news for America, too, isn't it? At least for those of
us who want George W. Bush's vision of a stable democracy in Iraq to become reality.
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:00am 01/20/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, January 18, 2006
|
|---|
| "Minnesota, land of 10,000 lakes" - 2006 preview
| | Senate Race: Rarely is an incumbent's retirement a bad break for the party out of power. It is even more
rare when that incumbent has not been tainted by any major scandals. Yet in Minnesota this year, that's exactly the situation. Freshman
Senator Mark Dayton has just not connected with the folks here, and his
sub 50% approval numbers bear that out.
The GOP was licking its chops to take him on, especially with the Republican field cleared for popular State Representative Mark Kennedy
to take the nomination.
To his credit, however, Dayton saw the provebial writing on the wall and decided to forego a run at re-election. His decision
tranformed this race from leaning Republican to a true tossup. The Democrats (DFL) who are running for the
nomination are Hennepin County Attorney Amy Klobuchar and former congressional candidate Patty Wetterling.
Klobuchar is the probable primary winner and will make a very formidable opponent to Kennedy in November.
At this point, this race is razor close.
The Blogging Caesar originally had this race going ever so slightly to the GOP. However, a major factor in
that pick was a primary battle I thought would damage the eventual Democratic nominee. That expectation arose from a
mistaken list of Dems in the running. I had previously included two other candidates which are not actually
running, and their absence clears the way for Klobuchar to emerge from the primary without much of a battle.
So, I'm changing my call on this one. I'm making it a weak Dem hold for Klobuchar.
Governor's Race: Tim Pawlenty won the Governorship of Minnesota with only 44.4% of the vote. That's not too remarkable in
Minnesota who elected an independent in 1998 (Jesse "The Body" Ventura). This year, he will probably need more than that to win.
Pawlenty's success as Governor - his approval has
skyrocketed to +24% in recent weeks - bodes
well for his re-election plans. Yet, Minnesota's aforementioned Democratic (DFL) lean makes him somewhat vulnerable.
So far, Mike Hatch, Attorney General, and State Senators Steve Kelley and Becky Lourey are in the running for the Democratic (DFL) nomination.
All are legitimate contenders, but The Blogging Caesar predicts Pawlenty to ride his positive approval numbers to a weak GOP hold.
House District 2: I wouldn't consider this race competitive except for the candidacy of Coleen Rowley. Rowley is a former
FBI agent and nationally recognized whistleblower. Even with the celebrity in the race, The Blogging Caesar believes John Kline will keep
his seat. Call it a (not-so) weak GOP hold.
House District 6: Mark Kennedy's quest for a Senate seat will leave his current House seat empty. Three state legislators,
State Senator Michele Bachmann, and State Representatives Jim Knoblach and Philip Krinkie will duke it out for the GOP nod, while former
Transportation Commissioner Elwyn Tinklenberg is the presumed choice of the Democrats. Even though Tinklenberg will not face
a primary fight, The Blogging Caesar predicts District 6, which is much more Republican than Minnesota overall, will remain in GOP hands.
Check out more on Minnesota here.
Update: Due to an incorrect list of candidates running for the Democratic Senate nomination, I
mistakenly called that race for the GOP. I've updated the list and my call. The result is posted now.
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:05pm 01/18/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Post-racial" era
| Betsy Newmark points to a great article
which describes African-American GOP gubernatorial candidate Ken Blackwell (Ohio) as a "post-racial, post-civil rights campaigner." What a
concept! I'm working on Minnesota's preview right now and should have it up tonight. In the meantime, be sure to visit Betsy and read
her post and then read the whole article linked there.
posted by Scott Elliott at 4:45pm 01/18/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, January 16, 2006
|
|---|
| A tribute to Dr. King
| | Today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Without belittling the importance of his contributions to our nation's
development, I am among the many who questioned the appropriateness of a federal holiday bearing his name. However, that fact will not
deter me from joining with Americans all over our nation in paying tribute to this amazing, God-fearing preacher from Georgia. So, to you
Dr. King, here is my tribute.
I recently watched for the second time the movie Remember the Titans. In case you didn't see it,
the movie tells the story of T.C. Williams High School's football team in Virginia in 1971. Forcibly integrated by federal mandate, the
school picks a black man, played by Denzel Washington, as its head football coach. A highly successful white coach, Bill Yoast, played by
Will Patton, is passed over for the job in favor of Washington's Coach Herman Boone. Yoast instead agrees to be Coach Boone's assistant.
Amid racially charged and violent times, Boone, with the admirable support and humility of Yoast, brings his team together. Animosity
between the white players and the black players turns to tolerance, acceptance, then respect, and, finally, genuine friendship. The story
is a wonderful testimony to the value of every human being, regardless of the color of one's skin. It is the very living out of Dr. King's
immortal vision of racial harmony. Add to that T.C. Williams' remarkable undefeated championship season, and you have a poignant
demonstration of what can be accomplished when people come together.
I salute Dr. King for his vision and the resolve he showed to make it reality. True racial harmony will not
come at the hand of legislation, though that was necessary to break down the walls of segregation. Rather, it will be through a
transformation of people's hearts and minds to look past the covering we all wear on the outside and into the heart which bears our true
identity.
Dr. King inspired us all to judge a person not by the color of his skin but by the content of his heart. Oh, that this would
be the steadfast resolution of each and every one of us today. Dr. King, I share your vision. Thank you for your life, your works,
and your inspiration. America is a better place because of you.
posted by Scott Elliott at 3:30pm 01/16/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Poll: Judge Alito's Senate confirmation vote
| | The latest edition of Election Projection's Weekly Poll is up. This week we're looking at Alito's upcoming
confirmation vote in the Senate. After last week's hearings, Alito appears to be headed for confirmation. How many
senators do you think will vote for Alito?
EP Contest: As an added twist, I'm opening up this comment thread for a contest. All Election Projection readers are
eligible to participate. I would like for everyone to enter the exact count of Republican, Democrat, and Independent (Jeffords) senators
they believe will vote for Alito. The reader(s) who is closest to the actual result will receive mention in this blog after the vote
takes place. Want to see you name in lights? Enter your prediction now.
Update: Alito contest is now closed. I'll post the closest predictions after the vote.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:05pm 01/16/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Great Lakes! It's Michigan!" - 2006 preview
| | Governor's Race: Almost exactly two years ago, a
Detroit News poll showed Democrat Governor Jennifer Granholm
with a job approval rating of 77%. Certain re-election faces elected officials with that lofty level of support. In the world
of politics, however, two years are an eternity. These days Granholm's approval has fallen in to the
low 40%. That's squarely in the
danger zone, and the Governor must be considered vulnerable in November.
The GOP appears to have settled on their candidate to see just how vulnerable Granholm truly is. Amway co-founder Dick DeVos
is the one, and he will have many millions of his own money at his disposal during the election season. While the funds to wage
an effective campaign will be working for DeVos, the partisan leaning of Michigan will not. If this were a red state like Arizona,
Granholm's approval ratings would indicate a GOP takeover. But this is not a red state, so Granholm is probably safe. We'll
have to see what kind of candidate DeVos turns out to be. If his candidacy catches on with voters here, I may change this race's
rating. But for now, The Blogging Caesar calls it a weak Dem hold.
Senate Race: The same partisan current from which Michigan's governor benefits is also fortifying Michigan's Democratic
junior senator. Freshman incumbent Debbie Stabenow has been in the GOP's sights since she upset another Senate freshman, Spencer
Abraham, in 2000. Add to that her
less-than-stellar job approval - she
has consistently polled under 50% approval - and a GOP victory would seem very possible.
So far, three Republicans have answer the call to unseat Stabenow. Oakland County Sheriff and former Michigan State Senate
Majority Leader Mike Bouchard is the frontrunner, though former Detroit City Councilman Keith Butler, an African-American, could mount
a legitimate challenge for the party nomination. Reverend Jerry Zandstra is also running. Bouchard would probably be the
strongest match against Stabenow, especially given that Oakland County is an important swing district in Mighigan.
Amid all this talk of the GOP gaining Stabenow's seat, two facts remain. Michigan is still a blue state, and polls have shown
her besting her potential rivals by substantial margins. I know polls this far out can change drastically as Election Day approaches,
and I'm not giving up on this seat just yet. Nevertheless, The Blogging Caesar must deem this race a weak Dem hold for the time being.
Check out more on Michigan here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:55am 01/16/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Upcoming posts
| Just a head's up to everyone that some time today I plan to have a new poll and a preview of Michigan posted.
Stay tuned...
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:35am 01/16/06 ::
link
|
| Thursday, January 12, 2006
|
|---|
| "Massachusetts by the bay" - 2006 preview
| | Governor's Race: One of the most unlikely anomalies in American politics today is the streak of 4
consecutive GOP victories in Massachusetts gubernatorial contests. Though Massachusetts is the most liberal state - bar none - in
the United States, a Republican has resided in the Governor's Mansion since 1991.
Things are about to change, though. Current Governor Mitt Romney is stepping down next year after one term, and The Blogging
Caesar sees the race to succeed him leaning toward the Democrats. Once again, the GOP will field a credible candidate as Romney's
Lt. Governor Kerry Healey is the likely GOP nominee. However, unlike recent elections here, the Democrats also have a solid
candidate on tap. He is Massachusetts Attorney General Thomas Reilly. If he can get past former U.S. Deputy Attorney General
Deval Patrick, which I expect he will, Reilly should become Massachusetts' next governor. If Patrick wins the primary, I will revisit
my projection. Right now, I'll take Reilly in primary and make this race a weak DEM gain.
Senate Race: Ted Kennedy, the most prominent mouthpiece of ultra-liberalism on Capitol Hill, is seeking re-election.
Do I really need to say it? Strong DEM hold.
Check out more on Massachusetts here.
posted by Scott Elliott at ::
link
|
|
|---|
| No, the system is not broken, Joe
| | "The system's kind of broken."
|
After yesterday's round of inquisitioning Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, Delaware Senator Joe Biden
expressed his opinion of the Senate hearing process.
| Americans should know how a nominee interprets the Constitution on key social
views, but since nominees refuse to discuss their interpretations, citing the possibility they’d have to rule on them in the future, the
hearings serve no real purpose, Biden said.
|
Senator Biden I have to disagree...and agree. First, I disagree because the Senate hearings do serve a purpose. They just don't serve
the purpose you wish they did. These hearings were never designed to qualify a judge's personal ideology. Instead, they are held to
determine whether the judge nominated has the legal competence to sit on the bench. Ideological stands on social issues should not be the
point of discussion. I believe that now just as I believed it when then-nominee uber-liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg refused to
disclose her position on abortion back in the 1990's.
However, Senator Biden, I do agree with you that your designs on these hearings serve no purpose. You will be
unable to stop Alito's confirmation. It is most likely the case that Alito is everything you wish you could ban from the Supreme Court -
yet with his inevitable confirmation, there's nothing you can do about it. Ginsberg sits on the Supreme Court because Americans voted for
liberal rule last decade; Roberts does too and Alito will shortly because we voted for conservatives in this one. Elections by the people;
elected officials nominating and confirming like-minded judges. It's America's way. The system is working just fine, Senator.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:55am 01/12/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, January 11, 2006
|
|---|
| "Maryland: strong deeds, gentle words" - 2006 preview
| | Governor's Race: Republican Bob Ehrlich defeated an unpopular Lt. Governor, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, in 2002 to
win a term as Governor of Maryland. In a state as liberal as Maryland, Democrat Townsend's unpopularity was the catalyst to Ehrlich's
victory, not, as some GOPers might like to think, a turn to the right in this state. Having a popular African-American on the ticket
couldn't have hurt him either.
This time, Ehrlich has neither a black running mate to run with nor an unpopular opponent to run against. As a result,
The Blogging Caesar fully expects Marylanders to resort to their natural tendencies and elect a Democrat in 2006. Which Democrat remains to
be seen. Two are set to wage a primary battle for the right to face Ehrlich. I'll give Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley and his
celebrity the edge over Montgomery County Executive
Doug Duncan right now. Either gentleman would most likely prevail in November, however. Rate this as another governorship
gain for the Democrats.
Senate Race: Democrat Paul Sarbanes is retiring after 5 terms in the Senate and 3 terms in the House before that. Chasing
after this open Senate seat is a popular African-American, Republican Lt. Gov Michael Steele. Given these factors, some Republicans are
optimistic about the GOP's chances to capture another Senate seat in a land of the Democrats. While Steele is probably the ideal GOP
candidate for Maryland, The Blogging Caesar is not optimistic about his prospects. I'm rating this race a weak DEM hold.
Democratic contestant Kweisi Mfume, were he to win the nomination, might make a Steele victory possible. I am confident, however,
that Mfume will definitely NOT be on the ballot in November, 2006. Instead, U.S. Rep. Ben Cardin, a senior member of the state's
national delegation, will be the party pick. This race is sure to garner a lot of national attention, but in the end, it will be
just another state majority party victory.
Check out more on Maryland here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 3:40pm 01/11/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, January 9, 2006
|
|---|
| Poll: Future of Roe v. Wade
| | With hearings on Judge Alito's Supreme Court nomination on tap, Roe v. Wade, the 1973 court decision which legalized
abortion in American, is once again in the spotlight. A major part of the comfirmation debate will be Alito's position on the issue of
abortion. Regardless of how you feel about abortion or even if it should be considered when confirming a president's choice for the Supreme
Court, what do you think about the future of Roe v. Wade? Be sure to answer Election Projection's Weekly Poll in the right sidebar.
Update: By way of clarification, saying Roe v. Wade legalized abortion is an over-simplification. In fact, Roe v. Wade
struck down a Texas statute prohibiting abortion and by association deemed unconstitutional a large body of state-mandated prohibitions and
restrictions on abortions. In effect, though, most abortions were made legal by that decision.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:00pm 01/09/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Remember the Maine" - 2006 preview
| | Governor's Race: Democrat John Balcacci narrowly won this race in 2002, and even though Maine is a decidedly
blue state, 2006 looks to be a challenge for him as well. Unlike other races around the country in which the GOP failed to recruit the best
challenger against a Democratic incumbent or open seat, GOPer and former U.S. Representative Dave Emery will be a solid foe in the general election.
That is assuming he emerges victorious from a crowded GOP primary field. State Senators Chandler Woodcock and Peter Mills are also
seeking the nomination, along with two businessmen, Mark Call and Stephen Stimpson.
Given Maine's Democratic leaning, one might think a Democrat in the Statehouse would not need to sweat re-election. However, like in many
other New England states, the GOP has shown the ability to contest well for the top job. Baldacci's
low approval numbers reveal his vulnerability.
It would not be surprising for the GOP to take another New England governorship here in 2006. However, The Blogging Caesar maintains that
Maine's Democratic tendencies and Baldacci's incumbency will overcome the obstacles which confront the Governor and give him another term.
I'll call it a weak hold, though.
Senate Race: Republican incumbent Olympia Snowe is by no means a conservative stalwart for the GOP. If she were, she'd have
no chance of winning one of Maine's seats in the Senate. As a liberal Republican, however, she does quite well here. Democrats are finding it
hard to find a credible candidate to challenge her. Couple that with Snowe's
ridiculously high approval,
and this one's easy to call: Strong GOP hold.
Check out more on Maine here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:40pm 01/09/06 ::
link
|
| Friday, January 6, 2006
|
|---|
| The Bush economy
| White House press release:
| Economic Growth Continues –
Unemployment Falls Below 5 Percent
Today, The Unemployment Rate Fell Below 5 Percent. The unemployment rate fell
to 4.9 percent – lower than the average of the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. 108,000
jobs were created in December, and revisions to previous months added 71,000
jobs. The economy has created more than 400,000 jobs over the last two months,
over 2 million jobs over the past 12 months, and over 4.6 million since May
2003.
Economic Growth Is Steady And Strong. For 10 consecutive quarters, GDP
growth has exceeded 3 percent.
The Economy Is Strong And Continues To Grow
GDP Growth Is Strong. The economy grew at 4.1 percent in the third quarter,
the 10th consecutive quarter in which GDP grew at a rate above 3 percent. The
composite index of leading indicators increased 0.5 percent in November and has
risen 1.7 percent over the past 6 months, indicating continued economic
growth.
Consumers Are Confident. The Conference Board index of consumer confidence
surpassed expectations and rose to 103.6 in December as consumers felt the
benefits of falling gas prices and continued job growth. Additionally, both the
University of Michigan sentiment index and Rasmussen consumer index reflected
strong consumer confidence.
Incomes Are Rising. Over the past 12 months, real disposable personal
incomes were up 1.5 percent. Since 2001, real after-tax income per person has
risen 7 percent. Household net worth is at $51.1 trillion – an all-time
high.
Manufacturing Continues To Expand. The Institute for Supply Management
(ISM), a private research group, reports manufacturing activity grew for the
31st consecutive month in December. The ISM's manufacturing index reading of
54.2 indicates continued sector expansion. According to the Federal Reserve,
total industrial production rose by 0.7 percent in November and manufacturing
industrial production is up 3.9 percent over the past 12 months.
Durable Goods Orders Surged In November. New orders for durable goods
increased 4.4 percent in November, far surpassing expectations of 1.2 percent
growth. Over the past 12 months, orders have increased 12.1 percent.
Productivity Growth Is Strong. After posting strong initial numbers of 4.1
percent, productivity was revised up 0.6 percentage point to 4.7 percent at an
annual rate in the third quarter. Productivity has grown at a 3.4 percent annual
rate since the end of 2000.
Construction Spending Is At An All-Time High. Construction spending rose
0.2 percent in November to a record high of $1.146 trillion at an annual rate
and has risen 7.8 percent over the past 12 months. According to the Commerce
Department, housing starts rose to 2.123 million units at an annual rate –
nearing a 20-year high. More Americans now own their homes than at any time in
the Nation's history, and minority home ownership is at a record high.
Inflation Remains In Check. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell by 0.6
percent in November – more than market expectations – reflecting a decline in
energy prices. Core CPI has increased a moderate 2.1 percent over the past year,
indicating that core inflation remains contained.
|
Woohoo!
Hat tip: Jonah at The Corner
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:50pm 01/06/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Down on the Louisiana bayou" - 2006 preview
| | House District 3: The political circumstances surrounding this race are quite unique. Rarely
do we see such a wide range of events impacting a single race. Let me give you a summary of those events and see how comfortable you
feel making a prediction for the outcome in 2006.
First, Democratic incumbent Charlie Melancon can credit his office to a fortunate
series of breaks during Election 2004. In the general election that year, the GOP received 59% of votes cast. In fact, Melancon's
24% bested third-place finisher Republican Craig Romero by just 1%. In Louisiana, the top two vote-getters face each other in a December
runoff election if no one is able to capture a majority of the vote in November. Gaining a spot in the runoff by just that 1%, Melancon's
chances at winning in December seemed dismal. Add to the mix that his opponent happened to the be son of the current representative of
District 3, and most observers felt a GOP victory was very likely. However, due to the nastiness of the contest between GOP frontrunner
Billy Tauzin III and Romero, the latter declined to endorse his fellow GOPer. Somehow, in a district that President Bush carried by 58% and
that featured the son of the GOP incumbent, Melancon snuck away with 50.2% of the vote.
His improbable victory is only the beginning, however. As we all know, Louisiana was ravaged last year by terrible hurricane Katrina.
District 3 endured a lion's share of that pounding, and many of the residents here have fled. The ramifications of this exodus and the
uncertain return of those displaced add more confusion to the eventual outcome of the congressional race here.
Finally, Melancon's opponent this time is none other than State Senator Craig Romero. As you can see, this race is interesting to say
the least. Under normal circumstances, I would side with the challenger in this GOP-leaning district. Of course, there is nothing
normal about these circumstances. In the end, I think Melancon will benefit from his visibility in the recovery from Katrina. Much like
a president benefits in a time of war, I believe a congressman such as Melancon will benefit from this crisis. So, The Blogging Caesar is
rating this race a weak DEM hold.
Check out more on Louisiana here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:30am 01/06/06 ::
link
|
| Thursday, January 5, 2006
|
|---|
| Are we lucky or is it good policy?
| James Glassman has written a must-read piece at
TCSDaily in which he examines the reasons why
we haven't been attacked again in this country by the terrorists. Is it luck or have the tactics we've
employed against Al-Qaeda, et al been effective in staving off another attack? Glassman writes:
| As I write, 1,576 days have passed since the
attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and still there has been no subsequent terrorist assault on American soil.
Every day, 130 domestic and 118 foreign airlines serve the United States. Air traffic controllers handle
20 million flights a year -- without a terrorist incident. In fact, the past three years have been
the safest in aviation history.
The United States remains the most open nation in the world. Since 9/11, scores of millions of sealed
trailer-size containers have entered U.S. ports, and 6 million legal international immigrants have joined
the American population. But no terrorist attacks.
Is this just good luck, or is it the result of good policy?
In other words, has George W. Bush succeeded -- at least, so far -- at the number-one task that Americans
have assigned him, which is to keep them safe? Or should we make him change his strategy and tactics?
These questions are especially relevant today. Congress has passed a bill that restricts the ways
terrorists can be interrogated; there’s outrage in the press at revelations that the National Security Agency
has intercepted, without warrants, international phone calls and e-mails that originate or end in the U.S.;
and, a popular new movie by America’s most esteemed director takes a skeptical view of aggressive retaliation
against terrorists.
|
The problem is something that concerned me very early after the attacks of September 11, 2001. I worried
that as time passed, as days turned into weeks and months turned into years, Americans would be unable to keep
fresh in their minds the character and intent of the ones whom we fight. Glassman points to that here:
| The danger is that the farther 9/11 recedes in memory, the
less we appreciate that it hasn’t happened again. When it comes to the war on terror, many Americans have
become short-sighted, ungrateful and decadent.
|
Success breeds complacency. I hope we Americans will not require another September 11 to remind us
who we are fighting and where our resolve needs to be.
Go read the whole thing.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:55am 01/05/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, January 4, 2006
|
|---|
| "Kentucky, bluegrass in a red state" - 2006 preview
| | The Governor of Kentucky, Ernie Fletcher is not up for re-election until 2007. Senators Mitch McConnell
and Jim Bunning won't need to run until 2008 and 2010, respectively. All but one of Kentucky's 5 representatives won in 2004
with at least 58% of the vote in their districts. The other one, freshman Rep. Geoff Davis, who now enjoys the benefit of incumbency,
won 54.4% of the vote in District 4 and will likely earn a greater portion in 2006. So, elections in Kentucky, at least the ones I
track, should be largely uneventful. I don't expect any change here. The only possible exception is perennial Democratic target
Anne Northrup in District 3. Although she narrowly won in 2000 and 2002, she received over 60% of the vote in 2004. For now,
she seems to be relatively safe, but I'll monitor this race to see if it becomes competitive.
Check out more on Kentucky here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:30pm 01/04/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Actually, Toto, we are in Kansas" - 2006 preview
| | Governor's Race: Kathleen Sebelius is a rare bird. Not only is she a Democrat governor
of a state that voted for Bush by a 25-point margin, but she also has a
+29% net approval rating.
It is hard to imagine the voters of Kansas throwing out a governor whom they feel so good about - even if she is a Democrat.
Since Kansas is such a red state, the pool of attractive candidates on the GOP side is deep and wide. Two such Republicans
are State Senator Jim Barnett and former House Speaker Robin Jennison. Either would be a solid challenger to Sebelius, but
not enough, in my book, to overtake her, barring an unforeseen political disaster for the incumbent. The GOP primary winner
will be well poised to take over the Statehouse when Sebelius steps down, however.
One issue that might help the GOP close the gap is the Governor's handling of the Kansas Supreme Court. Already she has
appointed 2 Democratic justices, giving Kansas' highest tribunal 5
Democrats and only 2 Republicans (in a state with only 27% Democrats). Nevertheless, The Blogging Caesar believes even that
issue will do little to threaten her. I rate this race a strong DEM hold.
Senate and House Races: Neither of Kansas' senators is up for re-election this year, and all four of
Kansas' representatives should win re-election.
Check out more on Kansas here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:10am 01/04/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, January 2, 2006
|
|---|
Prediction for 2006 2026
| | The new year is a time for turning over a new leaf, for making or affirming commitments to
improve ourselves. It is also a time when many of us enjoy prognosticating about the year to come. Right
now, though, I want to peer much further into the future and predict a culmination of a process that I believe has
already commenced in American politics. Since the radical changes of the 60's, the mindset of the people of
this country has been changing. Until recently, the differences in the political philosophies among Americans
fit well into two distinct political parties. The vast majority of voters could find a home either with the
Democrats or the Republicans.
Before 1960, values and morals were largely uniform across the political spectrum and largely mirrored the
Judeo-Christian heritage which defined American society for almost two centuries. Back then,
the issues with which we grappled did not include some of the most hotly-debated subjects of today. Such things
as abortion, homosexual rights, and pornography were almost completely absent from the mainstream political scene.
A lot has changed over the last 50 years, and that change has brought our current two-party system to its breaking
point. The social change of the last half-century, the emergence of the religious right, and a growing backlash
to socialistic economic policies is morphing the American electorate into three major political philosophies, not two,
and our two-party system is becoming less and less capable of accommodating this tectonic political shift.
So, here's my prediction. In the next twenty years or so, we'll become a three-party political system.
The Republican Party and the Democratic Party will be joined by the Libertarian Party as a legitimate force in American
politics. The Libertarian Party will grow substantially over the next couple of decades, pulling support from
both the GOP and the Democrats.
Here's the reason why: Many Americans are libertarian at heart - they just don't recognize it...yet.
These folks believe in less restrictions on behaviors (a liberal or Democratic view) and less involvement by the government
in economic issues (a conservative or Republican view). Right now, many closet Libertarians are counted among
the two major political parties. As Democrats continue to espouse increasingly liberal economic policies - such
as universal healthcare - it is becoming more and more difficult for libertarians in their ranks to remain.
Likewise, philosophical libertarians in the GOP are getting increasingly uncomfortable with the growing influence of
the values-based politics - such as pro-life policies and the Defense of Marriage Act - in their party.
These forces in both major parties that run contrary to their more libertarian brethren are showing no signs of
backing off. As a result, I predict a slow steady bleed of philosophical libertarians from both the Democrats and
Republicans. This migration will produce, sometime in the next two or three decades, a political system with
three major partisan players.
posted by Scott Elliott at 3:45pm 01/02/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| "Prizing liberties in Iowa" - 2006 preview
| | Governor's Race: Tom Vilsack is stepping down after 2 terms and will probably seek the
Democratic presidential nomination in 2008. Vilsack's departure should usher in an intense, closely-fought battle
to replace him. Iowa Rep. Jim Nussle has won several terms to the U.S. House in Demcratic-leaning District 1.
Hoping his wide appeal within his district will translate to statewide support, Nussle has decided to run for
Governor. He is the presumed GOP nominee, though 2002 candidate Bob Vander Plaats is also seeking the GOP nod.
So far, no fewer than 5 Democrats are slated to vie for their party's nomination. Currently, I don't see
a leader among that field. Prominent contestants include Iowa Secretary of State Chet Culver, State Rep Ed Fallon,
and Iowa Secretary of Agriculture Patty Judge. This race promises to be very close. At this point, The
Blogging Caesar is banking on Nussle's track record of winning in a Democratic district and a crowded, potentially
damaging Democratic primary to give him the win and a weak GOP gain in November.
House District 1: Only Jim Nussle's popularity has kept this increasingly Democratic district in GOP
hands. Now that he is running for Governor, the Democrats are poised to take back this seat. Several Dems
have indicated the desire to run, including Trial Lawyer Association Head Bruce Braley and economic development officer
Rick Dickinson. Larry Sabato says
these two lead former State Senator Bill Gluba for the Democratic nomination.
For the GOP, State Representative Bill Dix is ahead to gain the nomination over Brian Kennedy and businessman Mike
Whalen. Both Sabato and Charlie Cook rate this
race a toss-up. The Blogging Caesar see it somewhat differently. Given the success of recent Democratic
presidential candidates in this district, I'm calling this a not-so-weak Dem gain.
Check out more on Iowa here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:40pm 01/02/06 ::
link
|
|
|---|
| Time for your predictions
| This week's edition of the EP Weekly Poll asks you to register your predictions about the
upcoming year. How will the President's job approval numbers end up in 2006? How about the economy? 
Iraq? Be sure to take the poll and feel free to post additional predictions for 2006 in the comment thread of this
post.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:30am 01/02/06 ::
link
|
| Sunday, January 1, 2006
|
|---|
| Hail to the Redskins!
| My Redskins were mostly outplayed by the Eagles but turned 6 Eagle turnovers into a win and
their first playoff berth since 1999. Woohoo!!
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:20pm 01/01/06 ::
link
|
| |
|
|