Intermission 2005
    brought to you by "Election Projection"
Conservative Political Commentary
during the election off-season
Political Weblog | Daily Blog Roundup | 2004 Projection Results | Projection Formula | Poll Vault | The Blogging Caesar Bio

If you have enjoyed Election Projection and you appreciate the effort that goes into it, 
you can make a contribution here.  Thanks!! (no PayPal account necessary)... 
.
  Archives:   July 16-31, 2005

 


Edicts and Commentary

Friday, July 29, 2005

"Roll-adds"

This weekend, I'm going to be expanding my blogroll.  Each blog added will be noted in this post.  Two things to do, faithful readers:

1.  Check out the sites I'm adding.
2.  Post a comment to this entry if you own a blog or know of a blog you think is worthy of being enshrined in my blogroll.

Here we go (in no particular order):

  • The Black Republican
  • The Anchoress
  • Captain's Quarters
  • RedState.org
  • WILLisms.com
  • Thoughts Online
  • Dean's World
  • The Counterterrorism Blog
  • GOP Bloggers
  • JunkYardBlog
  • Irish Pennants

    Update:

  • Iowa Voice
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Pejmanesque

    Update2:

  • Peat Bog
  • Patrick Ruffini
  • The Volokh Conspiracy

    posted by Scott Elliott at 7:30pm 07/29/05
    Link to this post |


    Wednesday, July 27, 2005

    America's Christian heritage

    In Christian circles, it is widely held that the United States of America was founded as a decidedly Christian nation and remained so for many generations.  Sometime after World War II, secular humanist forces began to undermine that heritage.  Revisionist historians have attempted, in recent times, to re-qualify the founding character of American society and politics.  That's the impression many Christians have.

    As I've gotten more involved in learning about the political makeup of America, my long-held perceptions of America's Christian heritage, which largely mirrored the traditional Christian view, have been buffeted by secular humanist accounts.  Their version paints an entirely different picture of America's birth in the late 1700's and its maturation during the 19th and 20th centuries.  It is a picture in which the Christian God plays only a peripheral role in our nation's founding and development.

    Nathan Tabor of the Conservative Voice has written a wonderful article which greatly fortifies the traditional perception that we are (were) truly a Christian nation.  I encourage you to read the whole thing, but here's the money quote:
    ... the Supreme Court expressly declared in 1892 that America was indeed a "Christian nation."  Writing the Court's opinion in Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, Justice Josiah Brewer cited "the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation."

    "Our laws and our institutions must necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the Redeemer of mankind," Justice Brewer wrote.  "It is impossible that it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent our civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian.  This is historically true.  From the discovery of this continent to the present hour, there is a single voice making this affirmation."

    I imagine the history revisionists out there wish Justice Brewer hadn't said that!  You can read Justice Brewer's entire opinion here.  The opinion reads more like a theological examination of the law than a legal document.  In today's America, it would be considered secular heresy by the likes of the ACLU and the People for the American Way.  It sheds a light on the intent of the establishment clause in the first amendment.  Obviously, the intent was never to keep the Christian faith out of government.  Perhaps it was to keep government out of the Christian faith! (And other faiths, for that matter.)

    Addendum:  As Judge John Robert's Supreme Court nomination is questioned and debated, liberal senators will undoubtedly grill him on his view of precedent as it pertains to Roe v. Wade.  They will raise a stink if they suspect he is inclined at all to overturn the Court's prior ruling.  Whenever you hear that question arise, be it on the news or in newspaper editorials or during the confirmation hearings themselves, just remember the precedent set by Justice Josiah Brewer.  Maybe Ted Kennedy and Dick Durbin will make sure Judge Roberts upholds that one, too.  Somehow, I think not.  You see, Senators Kennedy and Durbin, et al, believe precedent is vital when they agree with it.  Precedent not to their liking, however, is conveniently ignored and readily discarded.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 10:40am 07/27/05
    Link to this post |


    Tuesday, July 26, 2005

    New format for the Daily Blog Roundup

    I've changed things around here at Election Projection.  Instead of inserting the Daily Blog Roundup into my commentary, I've moved it to a separate page.  Now, whenever you want to see what The Blogging Caesar is saying, just go to Election Projection's home page.  For easy access to the Daily Blog Roundup go to http://www.electionprojection.com/dailyroundup.html.  This new format should make navigating the site a bit less confusing.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 12:40am 07/26/05
    Link to this post |


    Monday, July 25, 2005

    If you're thinking about starting a website or you already have one, go to WiredGeorgia, featured in the left sidebar, and see what they have to offer.

    Quote of the day from Justice Souter

    Ann Althouse has a telling quote from a previous GOP "stealth nominee" David Souter...
    "I suppose I would have said I was a moderate conservative...I wouldn't have put myself smack in the middle.  But I would have put myself closer to the center than some but still on the right side."  Justice Souter said that -- two days after he was confirmed in 1990, in response to a question from a Boston Globe reporter.  He was never asked that prior to confirmation, but if he had been asked, that was his answer.

    So consider that, as you contemplate Judge Roberts.

    For those who aren't familiar with the term "stealth nominee," it refers to GOP-nominated judges without much of a paper trail.  Since it is hard to get a read on where they stand, Democrats have a hard time objecting, and confirmation comes easier.  President Bush's first Supreme Court nominee, Judge John Roberts, is one such pick.  He has an extremely short paper trail.  The problem with nominating someone like Roberts or Souter is the possibility that they turn out to be a lot more liberal than conservatives hoped they would.  Such was the case with Justice Souter.

    I wrote here that I believe Roberts will be more like Chief Justice Rehnquist, a solid conservative, than Souter.  After reading this quote, I'm encouraged that I may be right.  I doubt Roberts would fall anywhere close to the center ideologically.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 3:45am 07/25/05
    Link to this post |


    July 20, 2005

    The Supreme Court is moving to the right

    As a conservative, I can't imagine a better pick to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor than Judge John Roberts.  Not just because of his strong conservative values, but because of the difficulty democrats will have in stalling his confirmation.  Brilliant, eloquent, supremely qualified – these are the characterizations I've heard from all sides in the hours following President Bush's announcement.  As Lawrence Tribe, the attorney who argued Al Gore’s case in 2000, said on Larry King Live, "I like John Roberts.  I liked him even when he beat me [arguing a case in front of the Supreme Court].  He is great to work with and against.  If I were a justice, I'd love to have him as a colleague."

    Liberal special interests will, of course, fight this nomination, but his temperament, his intellect, his knowledge of the law, and his very short track record as a judge will make a filibuster politically impractical.  Abortion-rights groups will attack his apparent pro-life stance.  They will point of a trial brief, listing him as one of 6 authors, which contained, "We continue to believe that Roe was wrongly decided and should be overruled."  That brief, however, was written by his legal team in the capacity of a lawyer advocating a client's position.  As such, I don't think it will damage his chances at confirmation.

    Unlike judges nominated during the Reagan and Bush Sr years, the GOP has a solid majority in the Senate these days.  Barring a blockbuster revelation about the character of Judge Roberts, that GOP majority ensures that the filibuster will be the only way to defeat his nomination.  However, democrats and their allies will be hard pressed to invoke the "extraordinary circumstances" clause in the filibuster deal reached earlier this year.  Once again the wisdom of that deal on the republican side is coming through in spades.

    Judge Roberts’s confirmation hearings will be filled with a good dose of partisan rhetoric and bickering, but they will not include a filibuster.  Without one, democrats will have no way to stop his appointment.  In the end, in relatively short order, Judge Roberts will be confirmed to the Supreme Court.  I believe he will turn out to be a staunch conservative vote on the Court in the same mode as Chief Justice Rehnquist.

    President Bush, in his oft-maligned genius, has picked the perfect person to move this country to the right for the next 30 years or so as a justice on the Supreme Court.  In choosing a man without the hindrances of ideological baggage yet with a strong conservative ideology nonetheless, Mr. Bush has pulled a fast one on Senator Chuck Schumer and his ilk who were amassing their forces to wage war against whomever Bush picked.  They may still attempt war, but even they must know it will be futile.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 1:10pm 07/20/05
    Link to this post |


    July 18, 2005

    Daily Blog Roundup - DISCLAIMER

    Blog posts linked by the Daily Blog Roundup do not necessarily reflect the views of The Blogging Caesar.  Posts are selected on the basis of timeliness, relevance, intelligence and substance regardless of the point of view of the author.  Inclusion of a blog in the Daily Blog Roundup does not imply an endorsement of the blog's content.  The Daily Blog Roundup serves as a collection point for information, nothing more.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 1:50pm 07/18/05
    Link to this post |


    Daily Blog Roundup - tips really work!

    If you want to get your post on the Roundup, send me a note.  So far, I've only received a few, and all of them have made the list.  I love suggestions because it simplifies the task of finding good posts.  Of course, if and when the Roundup becomes more popular, I may not be able to include all the suggestions I receive.  For now, though, if you send me a tip, you've got a great chance of being included.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 1:40pm 07/18/05
    Link to this post |


    I made the list!

    John Hawkins of Right Wing News has posted his latest list of blogs he reads daily.  Lots of good blogs there.  For the first time, I made the list!  Cool.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 12:40pm 07/18/05
    Link to this post |


    July 17, 2005

    Please set a timetable for withdrawing from Iraq!

    Imagine just for a moment that you are a terrorist lieutenant hidden deep within a Sunni neighborhood in Baghdad, Kirkuk, or Tikrit.  You and the secretive operatives under your command have been carrying out successful attacks against American forces, Iraqi policemen, and Iraqi citizens for months now.

    The strife against agents of the Great Satan and backslidden Muslims around you comes with a price, though, and you’ve seen these enemies kill or capture many of your men.  You’ve even heard that other units within your network of insurgents have been completely obliterated.  You wonder how much longer the steady stream of replacements from Saudi, Pakistan and Syria can keep up with the casualties you’re experiencing.  You pause to ponder how grateful you are to Allah that the efforts of your troops and the rest of the jihadists continue to be emphasized and trumpeted throughout the world via the press.

    It must be an act of Allah, you surmise, that even the press in the infidel countries of Europe and, especially, the United States choose to focus so much on your actions rather than reporting the relative peace of the majority of Iraq and the great strides towards democracy that the people of Iraq have made.  You thank Allah for positive morale and resolute determination that you’ve seen grow in your men as they see on TV American politicians rail against military involvement in Iraq.  You look at your men and wonder about how many would not have decided to join this struggle had it not been for the constant condemnation of Bush's war from a large number of Americans, the hope-filling cries of quagmire and Viet Nam, and the incessant calls for American troops to abandon the struggle.

    Even so, these forces are strong and, to hear Bush speak, America is determined to fight you until you are incapable of waging war.  If only you knew how long they would stay.  If only there were some indication of how much longer you need to resist them.  A particular month would suffice.  Then, you could tell your men, "just hang on until then, and the enemy will leave us, and we will be free to punish these infidels and create another Taliban here in Iraq."

    "But," you think to yourself, "the enemy would never provide us with such a motivational tool.  They would be fools to name the day or the month of their withdrawal.  Surely they know that to offer such information would greatly increase the insurgents resolve and practically ensure your victory."

    Roused from your thoughts by the sounds of your favorite news program on al Jazeera, you walk inside and sit down in front of your TV.  Then you wipe your eyes in incredulity at the lead story that evening.  The reporter is interviewing several American politicians who are - are they really? – yes, they’re calling for a timetable for withdrawing American troops from Iraq!  Buoyed by this unbelievable possibility, you whisper praises to Allah and pray that this timetable becomes a reality.

    Let me bring you out of your imaginings and whisper a prayer myself that America will never set a deadline for leaving Iraq.  Certainly few things, the favorable press coverage included, would be as welcome to the terrorists in Iraq as that.  We must stay there until the job is done, or at least until the Iraqis are strong enough to finish it themselves - no matter how long that takes.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 11:15pm 07/17/05
    Link to this post |


    July 16, 2005

    The terror continues in Iraq

    The number of dead in terrorism's assault on freedom and democracy increased by at least 54 as terrorist insurgents bombed a gas station in Musayyib, Iraq today.  Each of these 54 leaves behind grief-stricken family and friends.  So shortly ago, I expressed a heavy heart of sympathy for Londoners.  My heart is heavy once again for this newest set of Iraqis who feel terror's cruel embrace.

    Unfortunately, I fear the Iraqi people will have to face this kind of pointless killing many times more as they resist and reject an ideology that would shackle their freedom and imprison their democracy.  Our American soldiers and other coalition forces are present in Iraq, doing what they can to defeat these terrorist murderers.  So are the Iraqis themselves.  Let's do our part, too.  Let's pray for stability and the triumph of democracy in Iraq.  And maybe someday, in the not so distant future, attacks like these will be so few and far between that when they happen, we'll be encouraged by how far we've come, not reminded that we still have a ways to go.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 10:50pm 07/16/05
    Link to this post |


    Weekday roundups only

    In an effort to head off possible burnout in the future, The Blogging Caesar has elected, at least for the time being, to post the Daily Blog Roundup Monday thru Friday only.  I hope no one is too disappointed.  If you are, you can express your disappointment in the comments section of this post. Otherwise, I'd love for everyone to post their impressions of the Roundup now that a week has passed.

    posted by Scott Elliott at 12:40am 07/16/05
    Link to this post |



     

  • Search This Site
       by Google

    e-mail Scott at:
    thebloggingcaesar
    @electionprojection.com


    2004 Projection Results


    Favorite Links

  • The Fourth Rail
  • PoliPundit
  • InstaPundit
  • RealClearPolitics
  • Viking Pundit
  • Michael Yon
  • Hugh Hewitt
  • PollingReport
  • Tim Blair
  • Betsy's Page
  • La Shawn Barber
  • Command Post
  • Crystal Ball
  • Atlas of US Elections
  • OnTheIssues.org

    Blogroll

  • The Adventures of Chester
  • The Anchoress
  • Backcountry Conservative
  • Baldilocks
  • The Black Republican
  • The Bleat
  • Blogs For Bush
  • Broken Masterpieces
  • By Dawn's Early Light
  • Byrd Droppings
  • California Yankee
  • Captain's Quarters
  • A Certain Slant of Light
  • Citizen Frank
  • Citizen Smash
  • The Counterterrorism Blog
  • Daily Pundit
  • Daly Thoughts
  • DANEgerous
  • Daniel Drezner
  • Dean's World
  • eTalkingHead
  • Election Junkie
  • Evangelical Outpost
  • GOP Bloggers
  • The Hedgehog Report
  • HobbsOnline
  • Intellectual Conservative
  • Irish Pennants
  • Iowa Voice
  • Jeff Doolittle
  • JunkYardBlog
  • Left Coast Conservative
  • letters from babylon
  • Libertarian Leanings
  • Little Green Footballs
  • Mark A. Kilmer
  • Mark Steyn
  • Matt Margolis
  • Michael Totten
  • Michelle Malkin
  • Murdoc Online
  • New England Republican
  • One Hand Clapping
  • Outside the Beltway
  • Pardon My English
  • Patrick Ruffini
  • Peat Bog
  • Pejmanesque
  • PoliBlog
  • PoliticalWire
  • Political State Report
  • The Politburo Diktat
  • Powerline
  • RedState.org
  • Right-Thinking
  • Right Wing News
  • Scrappleface
  • Slublog
  • SoCalPundit
  • Stolen Thunder
  • The Strata-Sphere
  • Thoughts Online
  • Virginia Postrel
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • WILLisms.com
  • Winds of Change
  • Wizbang!
  • The Word Unheard

    Archives

  • 07/01/05 - 07/15/05
  • 06/01/05 - 06/30/05
  • 05/01/05 - 05/31/05
  • 04/01/05 - 04/30/05
  • 03/01/05 - 03/31/05
  • 02/01/05 - 02/28/05
  • 01/01/05 - 01/31/05
  • 10/01/04 - 11/15/04
  • 09/01/04 - 09/30/04
  • 08/01/04 - 08/31/04
  • 07/01/04 - 07/31/04
  • 06/01/04 - 06/30/04
  • 05/01/04 - 05/31/04
  • 04/01/04 - 04/30/04
  • 03/01/04 - 03/31/04
  • 02/16/04 - 02/29/04
  • 02/01/04 - 02/15/04
  • 01/11/04 - 01/31/04
  • 12/08/03 - 01/10/04

    Just For Fun

  • Lots of Badgers
  • Where've you been?

    Blog Memberships

    Blogs for Bush

    North State Blogs