|
Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here. Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.
|
| Archives |
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| |
|---|
| Sunday, April 25, 2010 |
|---|
| Fifty state tour - Pennsylvania preview (part 2) |
House District 7: Democratic incumbent Joe Sestak has left this seat in search of the Senate seat currently held by turncoat Arlen Specter. First elected
in the blue wave year of 2006, Sestak's entrance and exit from the House is synchronized to the good fortunes of the Democratic Party, and he leaves a seat that will be difficult
at best for the Democrats to retain. The primary front runners are established for both parties and are nearly even in cash on hand. Combine that with the marginal
nature of this district, and you have a race that should be about tied all things being equal. But all things are not equal this year. I say the GOP tide will be
enough to upset the balance and give Republican Pat Meehan a Weak GOP Gain over Democrat Brian Lentz.
House District 8: Some districts, such as Pennsylvania's 4th, have races that seem to be moving toward the incumbent party candidate. Others have
the opposite feel. This district is an example of the latter. Initially thought of as safe, it has moved now to a Mod DEM Hold.
One main reason for the shift is Mike Fitzpatrick's decision to try again for the seat he won in 2004. Though Democratic incumbent Patrick Murphy ousted him just two
years later, Fitzpatrick brings to this race name recognition and the current letter-of-the-day after his name. He also brings the support of local Republican machinery
which should enable him to effectively play catch-up in the fundraising arena. It's true that Murphy has a substantial war chest ($1.3 million), but Fitzpatrick's $470,000
ain't too shabby, especially considering his late start relative to the incumbent. I predict this race will tighten before November, and, if the night meets moderate
expectations for the GOP, don't be surprised to count it among the list of Republican takeovers.
House District 10: This district has a legitimate rightward lean. Its Cook PVI is R+8. Incumbent Democrat Chris Carney has the
requisite "conservative" label attached to the D after his name, otherwise he probably would not be the incumbent right now. His victory in 2006 was largely due to the
sex scandal that was Don Sherwood's undoing, but he relied heavily on conservative credentials for his 2008 triumph. This year, his bid for a third term is a microcosm
of the political forces at work nationwide. Like so many other Democratic incumbents, he faces both the consequences of a yes vote for Obamacare and a
Republican candidate backed by Tea Party activists. Chiropractor David Madeira is just the type of novice candidate that could excite this conservative-leaning area no
doubt reeling from Carney's Obamacare vote. And this is just the type of race that can be impacted by the Tea Party movement. Right now this race projects as a
Weak DEM Hold, but it exudes the urge to flip to red by Election Day. However, if that is to be the case, Madeira or Tom Marino, the
other possible nominee, will have to overcome a substantial financial deficit. Carney has $665,000 in the bank. Neither Madeira nor Marino has eclipsed six
figures yet in that department.
House District 11: Democrat incumbent Paul Kanjorski has faced Republican Lou Barletta before - twice, in fact. In 2002, Kanjorski won the first
match up with 56% of the vote. Six years later, the two butted heads again. This time, even while President Obama was garnering 57% of the vote in
the district, Kanjorski needed all the help he could get to make it to 52%. The climate has changed for round three, and, for Barletta, that could make all the
difference. Two factors to keep in mind as we move toward the primaries and then onto the general election. First, how much fight will Corey O'Brien,
Kanjorski's primary opponent exert on the incumbent, and, second, how effective will Barletta be in closing an enormous fundraising gap which Kanjorski now leads 6 to
1? Time will tell, of course, but for now this race is classified as a Weak DEM Hold.
House District 12: The late John Murtha's unexpected passing has left this seat open and very much in play. At a Cook PVI of R+1, this district is
about as balanced as you can get. However, the coincidence of the special election to fill Murtha's seat with the statewide primary on May 18 may help Democrats
retain it. That's because in Pennsylvania's closed primary format, the Democrats' 2-1 edge in voter registration here provides them with a structural turnout
advantage. Yet, polls and pundit ratings would give the GOP a slight edge right now with Republican nominee Tim Burns leading the Democrats' pick Mark Critz by 3
in Public Policy Polling's mid-April survey. In light of that, the projection for the special election is a Weak GOP Gain. Given
the potential for Democratic turnout to be higher proportionally for this special election than they can expect to see in November, if they do lose the seat in 3 weeks, it will be a
very difficult task to take it back in 6 months. On the other hand, if Critz is victorious, this district is sure to land right back on the highly-vulnerable list once the
special election dust settles.
House District 15: At first glance, Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan appears to sit in an unusually strong position as a congressional challenger. He is
the party's first choice to run against the Republican incumbent in a district which boasts a slight Democratic lean, and his cash on hand outpaces the incumbent by $6000 -
something almost unheard of this early in a congressional race. Yet, the projection for this race is not all that close. Callahan's main problem is an issue of
timing. Had he contested for this seat two years ago, he would no doubt be poised to win it. This year, however, the climate just doesn't suit Democratic candidates
who have a penchant for raising taxes. (As Bethlehem mayor, he advocated a 17% increase in the local sales tax.) Illustrating voter sentiment, a
January poll conducted for incumbent Charlie Dent's campaign shows Dent with an overwhelming 53% to 27% lead over Callahan. Yes, this is a partisan poll, but
Callahan's climb is undeniably substantial even with the positives he has going for him. The opening projection is a Mod GOP Hold for
Dent. While this race could tighten, if could also widen if Callahan cannot counter the tax and spend mantle Dent is sure to try to pin on him.
House District 17: After re-districting gave this district a much stronger Republican lean, Democratic incumbent Tim Holden should have had a difficult,
if not impossible, challenge holding onto the House seat here. Instead, Holden has used a conservative voting record and strong personal ties to the more Republican
areas of the district to win the last several elections without any trouble - he claimed 64% of the vote here while President Obama could manage just 48%. Republicans
attribute his easy re-elections to a lack of formidable challengers, a shortcoming they think they can remedy this cycle. State Senator Dave Argull, they believe, can be
the threat Holden has not yet faced, and his strength is enhanced by the prevailing political winds. It remains to be seen if voters in the district will forgive him for
voting in his current job for an unpopular legislative pay raise, a move for which he has since apologized. Pundits appear to view Argull's candidacy in a positive light,
rating this race as competitive even considering Holden's previous overwhelming victories. Based on those sentiments, I rate this race a Mod
DEM Hold.
The Pennsylvania state page is one resource you'll want to take full advantage of.
Next stop: Rhode Island
Filed under:
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
PA House
PA Governor
posted by Scott Elliott at 6:51pm 04/25/10::
link
|
|
|
|
|
| Election Projection Resources |
EP's RSS Feed |
RSS
|
| 2010 Projection Results |
|
| 2008 Projection Results |
|
| 2006 Projection Results |
|
| 2004 Projection Results |
|
| Search this site |
provided by Google
|
| Contact Me |
e-mail Scott at: thebloggingcaesar -at- yahoo.com
|
|
|