|
Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here. Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.
|
| Archives |
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| |
|---|
| Monday, August 9, 2010 |
|---|
| "On the ground" in North Carolina |
Karl wrote in late last week with some good on the ground information from my home state of North Carolina. It looks like the Old North State could be treasure trove for House
Republicans this November. While a couple of early NRCC targets have fallen down the vulnerability scale, others have become much more competitive than anyone expected a year
ago.
|
Early favorites, NC-8 and NC-13, found crowded GOP fields, faced bitter primaries and eventually ended in competitive run-offs. This brought about plenty of anger and negative
campaigning between factions of Republicans, creating a Tea Party vs. conservative GOP divide that still lingers and threatens these opportunities for GOP gains.
However, NC-8 still remains a major focus of the NCGOP and the NRCC, and many Tea Party voters have come around to supporting GOP nominee Harold Johnson after their
favorite, Tim D'Annunzio, was shown to be a strange, troubled candidate, who had deceived even close supporters about his past. D'Annunzio's subsequent lawsuit against the
NCGOP and Johnson has actually helped to reveal his true nature and allowed for some GOP reconciliation between his former supporters and Johnson.
In NC-13, where Tea Party candidate Bill Randall won the run-off, many in the conservative GOP base are unconvinced that conspiracy-prone Randall can stay on message
long enough to defeat the Democratic incumbent, Brad Miller. NC-13 is a long, strangely gerrymandered district, which pairs conservative white rural Republican vote in the
northern counties with urban portions of inner-city Raleigh and Greensboro. While the NRCC hopes for NC-13 have dwindled, if Randall, a Black Republican from Raleigh, can make
meaningful gains among traditionally Dem-leaning voters in those urban areas, he still has some opportunity for a victory. (Scott's note: He could also pull out a squeaker if
the enthusiasm gap yields high enough Republican turnout in this district on Election Day. That seems to be a more plausible path to victory for Randall than winning over the urban
Democratic vote.)
Beyond these early targets, several other seats are now in play. NC-7 and NC-11, which seemed safe for Democrat Rep. Mike McIntyre and Rep. Heath Shuler - especially after
they voted against Obamacare - are now some of the most fertile areas for Republican pick-ups. Republicans already have a voting advantage in these districts, and despite McIntyre
and Shuler being Blue Dogs, they're still Democrats who would vote to keep Pelosi as Speaker. This, as much as anything, has opened up these races. But there are
other issues aiding Republicans as well.
In NC-7, Republicans got an unexpected surprise when conservative Catholic Marine Ilario Pantano entered the race. The GOP had already started backing 2008 nominee Will
Breazeale again in 2010 when Pantano entered the race. Republicans instantly recognized Pantano's strength, and several even negated their endorsement of Breazeale to support
him. McIntyre is also being hurt by liberal Democrats who are taking part in a boycott of his campaign in protest of his vote against Obamacare. Started by students at
UNC-Wilmington, the boycott is refusing to volunteer for his campaign and promising to stay home on Election Day. This angst from the left, coupled with the fact that Pantano has
proven to be an intelligent and inspiring campaigner, gives the GOP an opportunity to pick up this seat for the first time since the Civil War era.
As for NC-11, Shuler has played a role in opening this race up. Instead of settling in as a consistent Blue Dog who has high approval, even among Republicans, Shuler decided to
be proactive. His campaign ran a push poll in the district. The pollster conducting the poll suggested that his GOP opponent Jeff Miller's business was failing because of recent
losses and that he'd soon be closing down. While Miller's business had a tough year due to recession, he had laid off no workers and had no intention to close. Shuler's poll,
designed to undermine Miller's candidacy, backfired instead when workers from Miller's business went to the local media, fearing they'd lose their jobs. Shuler's campaign was forced to
admit they had paid for the poll and were only making assumptions about Miller's business, not working from fact. This instantly dropped Shuler's approval and removed him from any
high ground that he hoped to hold over other endangered "corrupt" Democrats. A poll was conducted the next week by Survey USA which showed that Shuler had fallen well below
50% and into a dead heat with Miller.
Two other districts, NC-2 and NC-4, have recently become competitive as well. These were districts where Republicans made half their 1994 gains in North Carolina, but both
went back to Democrats two years later. In 2000, Democrats had control of redistricting in the
state and made both districts slightly safer for Democrats. Republicans haven't really come close to taking either since. This meant that the NRCC focused no time on candidate
development in either district in 2010. Both races started out with a GOP field of 2008 nominees and a handful of political unknowns.
In NC-2, Renee Ellmers managed a decisive enough victory in the GOP Primary to avoid a run-off. Ellmers, a political newcomer, is a nurse, wife of a doctor and mother.
She was active in grassroots activity against Obamacare and was the strongest candidate in the 2010 GOP field. However, Etheridge has displayed an ability to hold onto this R+2 district. His connections here provide him with friends from both parties, and he seemed safe for re-election. This is likely why he felt comfortable voting for Obamacare this
past spring. But that was the first chink in his armor, and his poll numbers fell below 50%. Then came his angry tirade [caught on YouTube]. This severely eroded his
middle class support in the district, especially among women. Ellmers suddenly looked like the perfect candidate to challenge this bloated lifetime politician and his entitlement
mentality. This race is far from an easy GOP gain, but recent polling and Etheridge's own actions show a him to be very vulnerable in 2010.
Finally, there's NC-4, rated PVI D+8 by Charlie Cook. Incumbent Democrat David Price should be a shoo-in for re-election, but his support of Obamacare and every other bill pushed by
the White House has cost him support among many middle-class Democrats who see Obama's economic policies as an utter failure. Then there's 2008 nominee BJ Lawson. He
started campaigning for 2010 the day after his 2008 loss. In a 4-way GOP primary, which included a strong challenge from Frank Roche, Lawson managed to win solidly enough to avoid a run-off. It's rare that a candidate who lost by 26% returns to pose a stronger challenge to the incumbent two years later, but it's almost certain that BJ Lawson will do just that.
With the Presidential elections the focus of 2008, Lawson was defined by Democrats as a computer company owner from Florida. It went unnoticed that he was also a physician
who had graduated from Duke University Medical School, located in the district, and has lived in North Carolina ever since. This is now well-known and helped him have a strong media
presence during the debate on Obamacare. He published several well-informed and thoughtful op-ed pieces on the subject in local publications. And considering Rep. Price is a
UNC grad, many Duke students and alumni - both Republican and Democrat - have gotten behind Lawson's campaign this time around, hoping to finally have a "Blue Devil congressman."
NC-4 remains the toughest of the 6 CDs for the Republicans to win, but Price is certainly vulnerable. If the "Republican wave" continues to rise while Obama's approval falls, Lawson certainly is capable of picking this seat up for the Republicans.
|
The information in this post courtesy of
Karl Raszewski, Political Media Strategist
R.P.C.Strategies@aol.com
Filed under:
On the ground
House
North Carolina
NC House
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:08pm 08/09/10::
link
|
|
|
|
|
| Election Projection Resources |
EP's RSS Feed |
RSS
|
| 2010 Projection Results |
|
| 2008 Projection Results |
|
| 2006 Projection Results |
|
| 2004 Projection Results |
|
| Search this site |
provided by Google
|
| Contact Me |
e-mail Scott at: thebloggingcaesar -at- yahoo.com
|
|
|