|
Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here. Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.
|
| Archives |
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| - February, 2006 |
|---|
| Monday, February 27, 2006 |
|---|
"Rhode Island and the Providence Plantations" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: Who will face the Democrat in November? The answer to that question will determine who
will be senator from Rhode Island in 2007. RINO Lincoln Chafee was just liberal enough - and had just enough pedigree - in 2000 to be elected
in this extremely liberal state. Chafee was appointed senator in 1999 following the death of his senator father, John Chafee.
While he is a favorite target of conservatives like me, Chafee's presence in the Senate is nevertheless welcome. Many do not view things
as I do, however, and conservatives in Rhode Island are staging a revolt this year in the GOP primary. Cranston Mayor Stephen Laffey
has been chosen to carry the conservative mantle, and the threat he presents to the incumbent is both real and potentially damaging to the GOP's
national fortunes.
If Laffey wins, the GOP loses this seat, period. If Chafee pulls out a victory, The Blogging Caesar believes he will
prevail in the general election as well. My hunch is that after all the conservative bluster, Chafee will indeed emerge from the primary
to defend his seat in November. Ironically, a tough primary battle may be just what the doctor ordered in this case, since Laffey will no
doubt try to hurt Chafee by pointing to his liberalism. After all, Rhode Islanders like their senators to be liberal. Under the
assumption that Chafee wins the primary, I'm calling this a weak GOP hold.
Governor's Race: GOP incumbent Don Carcieri is a lot like his counterpart in neighboring Connecticut, Republican Jodi Rell.
Though his approval numbers are not quite as high as hers - nobody's are - he is still a well-liked GOP governor in an ultra-liberal state.
Even so, unlike Rell, he is not assured re-election. Rhode Island is just too liberal for any Republican to ever feel safe in a statewide
election, and his challenger, Democratic Lt. Governor Charles Fogarty will not be pushover. That said, The Blogging Caesar doesn't see
enough impetus here to oust the first-term GOPer. It won't be a blowout, though, so I'll rate this race a weak GOP hold.
Check out more on Rhode Island here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:50pm 02/27/06 ::
link
|
| "The KEYstone state of Pennsylvania" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: Few senators incite as polarized and intense a love/hate relationship with their constituents as
PA Junior Senator Rick Santorum. He is loved among conservative Christians for his stands on abortion and other values-based issues.
On the other hand, his sometimes controversial comments provide his liberal adversaries with plenty to stew over. In a deep red state,
Santorum would be sitting pretty. However, Pennsylvania is no Wyoming, and this blue-leaning state may be ready to kick Mr. Santorum
out of Washington.
If they decide to take that course, Bob Casey, Jr. will be the beneficiary. His candidacy introduces some interesting factors into
this race whose impact is difficult to predict. The most intriguing of these is his pro-life stance on abortion. From moderate
conservatives' standpoint, this may make Casey attractive enough to cause them to vote against Santorum, or at least diffuse some of the motivation
to vote for him. On the other hand, liberals will have to decide if they hate Santorum enough to venture out and vote for another pro-life
candidate. This pro-life battle makes this race one of the most entertaining of the 2006 election season.
If the election were held today, Casey would win. Santorum's deficits to Casey in polls have been astronomical for an incumbent this
early in a Senate race. However, don't think Santorum is destined to be defeated in a rout. Bad press for Santorum, Casey's well-known
family name, and the campaign off-season are major contributors to the incumbent's predicament. Mark my words, this will be a nail-biter
in the end. Nevertheless, The Blogging Caesar is leaning toward the challenger at the moment. As such, I'm projecting this race as
a weak DEM gain - the first Senate seat to switch parties so far in my initial tour of the 50 states.
Governor's Race: If Democratic Governor Ed Rendell were a cornerback and this were a football game, he'd have no chance against
his GOP challenger. Lynn Swann, the hall-of-fame wide receiver and possessor of 4 Super Bowl rings, has decided to try his skills on the
political field. Polls show Swann's candidacy is connecting with Pennsylvania voters. His 20-point deficit 5 months ago is now gone,
and he is in a statistical dead heat with the incumbent.
While Swann's celebrity will play well initially, the main question in this race boils down to the public's tolerance of both Rendell's
incumbency and Swann's inexperience. The mood toward Rendell's governorship is growing increasingly negative. The poll showing
a statistical tie between the two men also finds 54% of registered voters believing Rendell doesn't deserve re-election. That may indicate
Swann will be able to win his first attempt at elected office.
On the other hand, Rendell will probably be able to paint Swann as ill-equipped to go from the football field and broadcast booth to the
Executive Mansion. We'll have to see how far Swann's celebrity will take him and how much political savvy he brings to the table.
Right now, I think Rendell will pull this one out. Even though I try to be objective in my projections, I must admit that this pick stems
from the sense of pessimism I feel about the GOP's performance in Pennsylvania. I've been disappointed too often to imagine that the GOP
will be able to pull Swann to victory in November. It will be a close race, and I could change my mind quickly, but for now The Blogging
Caesar is calling this race a weak DEM hold.
House District 6: Larry Sabato calls Jim Gerlach possibly the most endangered GOP incumbent of all in 2006. In addition
to defending an increasingly Democratic district, he must face the same opponent he narrowly defeated last time. Attorney Lois Murphy is
back and raising dough at a break-neck pace. If Gerlach is still in Congress in 2007, the GOP will have a larger majority than they do now.
The Blogging Caesar believes only a much-improved situation nationally for the GOP will save this seat for him. Give it to the challenger
in a weak DEM gain.
Other Races: Three other GOP seats must be listed as possible competitive races. If things go poorly for Republicans,
districts 7, 8, and 10 may also join Gerlach's seat on the other side of the aisle.
Check out more on Pennsylvania here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 8:40pm 02/27/06 ::
link
|
| Poll: What about the port deal? |
The latest edition of Election Projection's Weekly Poll is up. Much has been made of the controversial deal to give
administration of several U.S. ports to a firm from the United Arab Emirates. The poll asks what you think about it. Enter your
response there and discuss it here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:25pm 02/27/06 ::
link
|
| "Blazing a trail to Oregon" - 2006 preview |
| Governor's Race: In 2002, Democrat Ted Kulongoski and Republican Kevin Mannix engaged in a closely fought
race here which the Democrat narrowly won. In 2006, Mannix is hoping to get another shot at Kulongoski. Considering the incumbent's
low and falling aproval numbers, Mannix
might like his chances in a rematch. However, round 2 may never happen due to another rematch brewing in the GOP primary.
Mannix defeated former school board member Ron Saxton in 2002. This year, Saxton must be considered a legitimate possibility,
especially since he is fundraising so well.
State Senator Jason Atkinson is also running, but I don't think he will impact the race much. Right now, I'll give Saxton the edge in
the primary. His strong run in 2002, his cash on hand, and Mannix's lingering $400,000 debt from
last time will help win the nomination for the runner-up in the last GOP primary.
In the general election, The Blogging Caesar is sticking
with Kulongoski for re-election. His approval numbers are problematic, and the GOP could pull off a mild upset, but Oregon is blue and
getting bluer. It'll be Kulongoski in a weak DEM hold.
Check out more on Oregon here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:00am 02/27/06 ::
link
|
|
| Thursday, February 23, 2006 |
|---|
| "Oklahoma!" - 2006 preview |
| Governor's Race: Democrat Brad Henry gave his party faithful one bit of good news on Election Night 2002.
While the GOP was winning most of the contested races nationwide, Henry took advantage of some late missteps by GOP nominee Steve Largent to
win the governorship here. In this extremely conservative state, Henry's feat was quite remarkable. He has governed well in the 4 years
hence and is well-positioned to be re-elected.
Given Henry's awesome approval numbers,
even a well-respected GOP Congressman like Rep. Ernest Istook must be considered a significant underdog at this time. If Oklahoma weren't so
red, I'd rate this race a strong DEM hold. Since it is, I'll make it a weak DEM hold. After all, as Larry Sabato says, "in Oklahoma
any legitimate GOP candidate must be taken very seriously."
Check out more on Oklahoma here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 4:30pm 02/23/06 ::
link
|
| "Ohio the beautiful" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: The GOP has fallen on hard times in Ohio with current GOP Governor Bob Taft boasting the
single worst approval rating I've ever
seen.  That fact has caused many Democrats to salivate over Mike DeWine's Senate seat. His own approval ratings leave
much to be desired and would seem
to justify optimism among his adversaries. Moreover, the Democratic field has been cleared for a legitimate challenger to emerge
without much of a primary fight.
Ironically, that fact may prove to work in DeWine's favor. I'm referring, of course, to Paul Hackett's forced
exit from contention. Hackett, you may recall, is the Iraqi War veteran who
nearly unseated Jean Schmidt in 2005 in a heavily Republican
district. With that near-miss under his belt, he set his sights on DeWine. But with the high-profile, well-funded U.S. Rep
Sherrod Brown running against him, the Democratic Party bosses decided to
coerce their once-loved poster boy out of the race. The
manner in which his departure came about has irked his supporters and may hurt Brown in the general election.
DeWine is indeed vulnerable, but The Blogging Caesar doesn't see him actually losing. Hackett's hatchet job notwithstanding, I don't
think DeWine was ever on the brink of defeat. In fact, the GOP in Ohio has seen the bottom and will rebound to some extent by November.
DeWine will be re-elected by a close margin. Verdict: Weak GOP hold.
Governor's Race: Back to the woeful Taft and the race to replace him. It would seem impossible that Ohioans would regard
their Governor with such contempt and then elect another candidate from his party. That, however, is just what current state-wide office
holders Ken Blackwell and Jim Petro face. Blackwell who is Secretary of State holds an advantage over Petro, the Attorney General, in the
primary contest.
On the Demcratic side, U.S. Rep. Ted Strickland is the favorite. Polls
currently indicate the
incumbent party is indeed headed for defeat. The Blogging Caesar is going to join the flow and predict a Democratic victory.
However, I really do believe the GOP's lot will improve before November. While Strickland will most likely eventually win by a close
margin, I don't consider it a foregone conclusion. After the primaries, we'll just have to see how these two campaigns develop.
House Districts 6 and 18: I'm including these two congressional races together because my hunch is they will both go the same
way. Problem is, I don't know which way that will be.
In District 6, we have gubernatorial candidate Ted Strickland's marginally conservative district. It is ripe for the picking for the
GOP. The primaries in this race are but a formality as State Senator Charlie Wilson and State Rep. Chuck Blasdel will win the Democratic
and Republican nominations, respectively. Wilson maintains a 3:2 fundraising edge right now. Flip a coin.
District 18 doesn't feature an open seat, but it does feature a GOPer with ties to Jack Abramoff. Bob Ney would
easily win re-election here were it not for his association with Abramoff. Since he is connected to the indicted lobbyist, Ney is in for
a major struggle to retain his seat. I recently conducted a poll which asked how many GOP seats would
be lost as a result of the Abramoff scandal. This is probably the most likely to fall into that category, at least in the House.
Working in Ney's favor is a large fundraising advantage. He leads probable Democratic nominee Chillicothe Mayor Joe Sulzer over 2:1 in
that all-important statistic.
So, who will win these to hotly contested races? If you've read The Blogging Caesar for long, you know I'm loathe to leave races as
toss-ups.  In this case, I really do believe the fortunes of the GOP in Ohio in general will be the determining factor in both races.
If the party rebounds, they should win both; if they sink lower, they will most likely lose both. You might call this predicting a toss-up
without actually predicting a toss-up, but my preliminary projections here favor the incumbent party in both cases. Weak DEM hold in District 6;
weak GOP hold in District 18.
Check out more on Ohio here.
Instant Update: (District 6) Thanks to a tip from a reader, I've learned that Democrat Charlie Wilson will apparently
be disqualified from running in the Democratic primary. If this
report holds up, this race changes character immediately. I'm not going to make any changes to the projections right now, but I certainly
will revisit this race the first time I update Ohio after all the previews are done.
posted by Scott Elliott at 1:10pm 02/23/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, February 20, 2006 |
|---|
| Poll: Who's the greatest U.S. President? |
The latest edition of Election Projection's Weekly Poll is up. In honor of President's Day, I thought I'd
get everyone's opinion of who the greatest United States President is. Vote for your choice and then discuss it in the comment thread of this
post. Try to keep the discussion to presidential greatness - that means don't start bashing Bush for WMDs or Clinton for Monica, etc.
posted by Scott Elliott at 3:20pm 02/20/06 ::
link
|
"Forever North Dakota, one and inseparable" - 2006 preview |
Senate Race: With the possible exception of the Senate race in Washington, this race is the biggest "what
could have been" for Republicans. In this very deep red state, all three men in North Dakota's congressional delegation are Democrats.
It is an interesting oddity that will continue beyond 2006 since GOP Governor John Hoeven declined to challenge incumbent Democrat Kent Conrad.
Hoeven is possibly the only GOPer who can muster an effective challenge to either Democratic senator at this time. With him in the race,
The Blogging Caesar would be tempted to rate it a weak GOP gain. Without him, this is squarely in strong DEM hold territory. ...sigh...
Oh well, maybe the Governor will take on Byron Dorgan in 2010.
posted by Scott Elliott at 2:50pm 02/20/06 ::
link
|
| Friday, February 17, 2006 |
|---|
"Nothing could be finer than North Carolina" - 2006 preview |
| House District 11: GOP incumbent Charles Taylor has been a mainstay in this westernmost district of North
Carolina for over 15 years. District 11 is situated in the beautiful Blue Ridge Mountains and is reliably red under normal circumstances.
However, this year's race is not being run under normal circumstances. Taylor has faced charges of ethics compromises and has drawn a
celebrity opponent on the Democratic side. Even though Taylor's victories have been mostly comfortable in the past, his alleged banking
improprieties and former NFL Quarterback Heath Shuler will make a victory this time more difficult to gain. Nevertheless, The Blogging Caesar
is counting on the 55-60% Republican lean of the district to carry Taylor to a ninth term in a weak GOP hold.
Other races: Neither of the two GOP senators nor Democratic Governor Mike Easley is up for re-election in 2006. Of the remaining
house races here, only Robin Hayes' 8th District might be somewhat competitive. I will keep an eye on this race as the year progresses.
Check out more on North Carolina here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 5:00pm 02/17/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, February 15, 2006 |
|---|
| "New York, on the banks of the Hudson" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: With incumbent Senator and former Co-President Hillary Clinton up for re-election, this race
was never going to be much of a contest. And then the GOP's best candidate, Jeanine Pirro, declined to run. Her decision moved
this race from a strong DEM hold into Thad Cochran territory. I doubt Hillary will get 84.9% of the vote like he did in 2002, but she'll
be way over 60%. The most intriguing question about this seat is whether the transplanted New Yorker will still be seated on it in a couple
of years.
Governor's Race: GOP incumbent George Pataki has taken an amazing nose-dive since New Yorkers rallied around him and Mayor Guiliani
in the aftermath of September 11. It has been George H.W. Bush-like in its severity. Now, in the face of sure defeat, Pataki has
decided to retire. Not that his stepping down gives the GOP any hope of retaining this seat, however. Democratic Attorney General
Eliot Spitzer will see to that.
An interesting facet of this race is the unlikely candidacy of former Massachusetts Governor William Weld. His presence will not help
matters for the Republicans as it just clutters up the GOP field. This race is unique to this point in that not only does The Blogging
Caesar predict the incumbent party will lose, but it will lose big. Spitzer will become the next governor of New York in a strong DEM gain.
House District 29: GOPer Randy Kuhl won this seat by a narrow margin in 2004. Narrow margins by first-time winners are not
uncommon. Most times a freshman congressman will use the power of incumbency to widen that margin the next time around - unless his first
victory resulted from a partisan wave. In Kuhl's case, he did not benefit from such a wave in 2004 and should be reasonably safe, relatively
speaking, in 2006. Nevertheless, his performance in 2004 was less than stellar, and his potential Navy vet opponent could give him trouble.
For the meantime, though, The Blogging Caesar rates this contest a weak GOP hold.
Check out more on New York here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:50am 02/15/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, February 13, 2006 |
|---|
| "Enchanting New Mexico" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: With the decision of Democratic incumbent Jeff Bingaman to run again for this seat, a potentially
competitive race was removed from the horizon. Bingaman will cruise to re-election. Had he decided to retire, Rep. Heather Wilson would
have given the GOP a great chance at a pick-up. Instead, Wilson is locked in a razor-close battle to save her own seat in the House, and a gaggle of
minor figures will fight through the GOP primary for the opportunity to get creamed in the general election. Easy call for The Blogging Caesar:
Strong DEM hold.
Governor's Race: Bill Richardson is eyeing a greater role than his current position as New Mexico's governor. Instead of
the New Mexico Statehouse, he'd rather take up residence in the White House. In the meantime, getting re-elected to said statehouse will be
an easy task for this former Clinton administration cabinet member. Unfortunately, neither minister George Bailey nor radiologist J.R. Damron
will be able to unseat the incumbent - not by a long shot. Another easy call, another strong DEM hold.
House District 1: What the statewide races lack in drama, this race more than compensates for. Incumbent Heather Wilson, a
Republican, is in the political fight of her life in this hispanic district won by John Kerry in 2004. To add to her troubles, the best
candidate possible is lining up opposite her. Hispanic Attorney General Patricia Madrid will be formidible for sure.
This race is very difficult to call right now. Many pundits are calling it a tossup, and if I allowed myself to call tossups, I would too.
I don't, however, and so I deliberate. In the challenger's favor are her hispanic heritage, the district's Democratic lean, her statewide
popularity, and her recent fundraising prowess (even though Wilson leads in cash-on-hand to date, Madrid won the fundraising race handily in the
fourth quarter last year).
In the incumbent's favor are her willingness to criticize her party's leadership in the House - a good thing in a
Democratic district, her own popularity, and her incumbency. With extreme hesitation, The Blogging Caesar is going to give it to the hispanic home
girl by the narrowest of margins. Call it a weak DEM gain - but don't be surprised to see this one go flippity-flop-floppity-flip all the
way to November 7.
Check out more on New Mexico here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:45pm 02/13/06 ::
link
|
Poll: What effect, if any, will the Abramoff scandal have on Election 2006? |
The latest edition of Election Projection's Weekly Poll is up. With Jack Abramoff's constant presence in the
news media, I thought I'd query my readers to see what effect this scandal will have in real terms on the mid-term elections in November.
I'm sure there will be lots you guys want to talk about on this subject. So, answer the poll and then discuss it by clicking on the
comment link below to enter your own punditry.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:10am 02/13/06 ::
link
|
| Thursday, February 9, 2006 |
|---|
| "Under the boardwalk, New Jersey style" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: Though he began 2005 as Senator from New Jersey, Jon Corzine ran for the governor's job in New
Jersey's odd-year gubernatorial election last year and won. As the newly elected governor, Corzine got to choose his own successor.
That man, former U.S. Rep. Robert Menendez, was sworn in on January 16, 2006, making him the quasi-incumbent in this race. He is looking
to be elected in his own right in November.
Facing him will be Republican Tom Kean, Jr., the son former GOP Governor Tom Kean, Sr. The younger Kean represents what some New Jersey
Republicans feel is a great red hope for the GOP in a state which has not elected a Republican senator since 1972. Early indications are
that this will be a close race - a poll released in January showed Kean with a double-digit lead. However, since 37% of those polled were
undecided, I don't put much stock in Kean's apparent lead right now.
New Jersey is solidly Democrat, and voters hear often deceive GOP hopefuls with promises of support. I say that because I've noticed
a trend in this state where GOP candidates boast strong numbers in early polls only to see those numbers swing toward the Democrat by Election
Day. To mix metaphors, when all is said and done, the chickens will come home to roost and Senator Menendez will keep his newly-acquired
seat in Washington. Due to the Kean family prominence, though, The Blogging Caesar rates this a weak rather than strong DEM hold.
Check out more on New Jersey here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:25pm 02/09/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, February 8, 2006 |
|---|
| "Living free in New Hampshire" - 2006 preview |
| Governor's Race: New Hampshire has traditionally had an independent streak. Until recently, that
tendency was demonstrated in New Hampshire's persistent GOP lean amid a sea of New England blue. With the influx of hordes of transplants
from neighboring Massachusetts, however, New Hampshire is beginning to reflect the preference for Democrats long associated with the Northeast.
Baystater John Kerry's candidacy accelerated this red-to-blue shift. In the 2004 presidential elections, New Hampshire was the only
red state from 2000 to be won by the Democrat. Accompanying Kerry in the Granite State's winner's circle was gubernatorial candidate
John Lynch. Lynch's victory is note-worthy because of New Hampshire's rare 2-year-terms for governors and their reluctance to reject
a first-term executive officer. Republican Craig Benson was the first freshman governor to fail to gain re-election here in over 8 decades.
The only real chance the GOP had of regaining the statehouse was for Lynch to perform poorly - as his predecessor did. Instead, Lynch
has done very well, at least as judged by his astronomical +42% net job approval. The Blogging Caesar rates Lynch a shoo-in
for re-election. State Representative Jim Coburn doesn't stand a chance.
Senate and House Races: New Hampshire's congressional delegation is oddly still completely red. And it will remain as such
with neither GOP senator up for re-election and both GOP congressmen cruising to another term.
Check out more on New Hampshire here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 7:05pm 02/08/06 ::
link
|
| Missed opportunities or emerging Republican majority? |
The New York Times has an article out today in which Democrats express a
growing pessimism
about this year's mid-term elections. Not too long ago, with President Bush's approval numbers in the upper 30's and many congressional
Republicans wearing the ball and chain of various scandals, Democrats were hopeful of great gains in the Congress. Now, they are sensing
missed opportunities.
| Democrats are heading into this year's elections in a position weaker than they
had hoped for, party leaders say, stirring concern that they are letting pass an opportunity to exploit what they see as widespread Republican
vulnerabilities.
In interviews, senior Democrats said they were optimistic about significant gains in Congressional elections this fall, calling this the
best political environment they have faced since President Bush took office.
But Democrats described a growing sense that they had failed to take full advantage of the troubles that have plagued Mr. Bush and
his party since the middle of last year, driving down the president's approval ratings, opening divisions among Republicans in Congress
over policy and potentially putting control of the House and Senate into play in November.
Asked to describe the health of the Democratic Party, Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, the former chairman of the Democratic
National Committee, said: "A lot worse than it should be. This has not been a very good two months."
"We seem to be losing our voice when it comes to the basic things people worry about," Mr. Dodd said.
|
I'll give you two reasons why I think the Democrats' rose-colored glasses are coming off. First, the party of FDR and JFK are simply moving
too far to left to support a majority of Americans. At the same time, America is beginning to slow the gradual shift to the left it
experienced in the last half of the 20th century. I highlighted America's changing ideological makeup and how the Democrats are losing ground
last August.
Second, the monopolistic grip on spin held by the mainstream media is all but gone. In prior times, negative stories about the GOP and
conservatives would inflict maximum damage as a result of a constant, unbalanced barrage of news coverage. These days, big media still trumpets
its unending Democratic party line, but they have lost a tremendous amount of credibility among everyday Americans. Today people take much of
what MSM produces with a grain a salt as though they were listening to a bunch of Democratic propagandists. Considering the fact that "inside-
the-beltway" journalists vote Democrat in roughly the same proportion as African-Americans, they're undoubtedly right. Moreover, the rise of
conservative talk radio and the conservative hemisphere of the blogosphere has provided a consistent source for "the other side of the story."
I'm definitely not taking anything for granted in this year's elections, and I'm in no way predicting another resounding GOP victory.
However, if the Democrats don't make a solid showing in November, it will be an undeniable sign of just how far the party has fallen. If they
can't win in 2006, it might be a long, long time, barring a fundamental ideological change in direction, until they win again.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:10pm 02/08/06 ::
link
|
| Monday, February 6, 2006 |
|---|
| "The chips are down in Nevada" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: John Ensign is a Republican incumbent in a red state. He faces no primary opposition, and
his approval numbers currently stand at net +13%.
Normally, these attributes would indicate a strong GOP hold. However, there are 3 factors I see in this race that cause me to downgrade
the GOP's chances and rate this race a weak GOP hold instead.
First, Nevada is by no means a deep red state - they voted basically identically to the nation as a whole in 2004. Moreover, Nevada
sports a split delegation to the U.S. Senate and is certainly not a given to vote red in 2008. Second, Ensign's approval numbers, while
positive, are not especially strong. By comparison, his Democrat counterpart, Harry Reid, boasts a net +21% mark for the job he's doing.
Third, he faces an unknown quantity on the Democrat side in Jack Carter. If the name sounds familiar, that's because it is. Jack's
father is James. As in James Carter. As in Jimmy Carter. As in former President Jimmy Carter. Jack has never run for
public office before, but his high profile pedigree gives him a measure of celebrity, the effect of which on the outcome of this race is hard
to predict right now.
I feel pretty confident Ensign will prevail. However, due to the factors I've mentioned above, my confidence level will only allow me to
rate this race a weak GOP hold.
Governor's Race: An interesting intra-party duel is unfolding in this race. Term-limited GOP incumbent Kenny Guinn and
presumed GOP nominee, U.S. Rep Jim Gibbons are, um, let's say not bosom buddies. In fact, Gibbon's decision to run for Governor incited
Guinn to push Lt. Governor Lorraine Hunt to consider running. Hunt has decided she will do just that. Gibbons should win the nomination,
and he should win the governorship in November as well. However, a dirty primary and party infighting - should they occur - may give the
Democrats all they opportunity they need in this marginally red state to capture the Statehouse.
Running for the Democratic nomination are current State Senator Dina Titus and Henderson Nevada Mayor Jim Gibson. Right now, the money's
on Titus for the party spot. A Gibbons/Titus matchup will be entertaining with Gibbons the early favorite and Titus' chances hinging on how
battered Gibbons is coming out of the primary. The Blogging Caesar will stick with Gibbons and call this a weak GOP hold as well.
Check out more on Nevada here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 2:45pm 02/06/06 ::
link
|
| Poll: Is there a war in Iran's near future? |
The latest edition of Election Projection's Weekly Poll is up. This week, we're looking at the situation in Iran.
The mullah's intentions to continue pursuing nuclear capability is putting a great strain on their international relations. Will we
see war start there in the near future? Be sure to answer the poll question and add your thoughts in the comment thread of this post.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:30am 02/06/06 ::
link
|
| Thursday, February 2, 2006 |
|---|
| "On Nebraska's cornhuskers" - 2006 preview |
| Senate Race: Democrat incumbent Ben Nelson is not such a bad guy - even for my conservative tastes. His
conservative leanings are his life preserver in this deep red state. Even though I would love to see another GOP senator take office next
year, I'm not too disappointed that Senator Nelson will probably keep this seat. The GOP lost a golden opportunity to wrest it away from
Nelson when then-Governor Mike Johanns accepted the position of Secretary of Agriculture in the Bush administration thus removing himself from
contention.
I am calling this race for Nelson at the moment, but given Nebraska's conservative nature, a GOP victory is not impossible. If that
happens, Nebraska State GOP Chairman David Kramer, former Nebraska Attorney General Donald Stenberg, or Peter Ricketts, former COO of Ameritrade
will be the next senator here. Those three comprise the field seeking the GOP nomination. I'm not sure who has the edge right
now, but I get the feeling Ricketts candidacy may be picking up steam. At any rate, until something changes - if it does - The Blogging
Caesar will keep this race in the weak DEM hold column.
Governor's Race: Early last year, President Bush came knocking and Mike Johanns answered the door. His departure elevated
Lt. Governor Dave Heineman to the governorship. After doing an admirable job since then and running as a quasi-incumbent, Heineman could
be expected to cruise to election in his own right in November. However, he is being challenged a virtual Founding Father in Nebraska -
former head football coach Tom Osborne. Larry Sabato has a great
rundown of this race at his website. Sabato writes...
| The Republican Party will decide the next governor in this heavily GOP state.
Governor Mike Johanns left office early to become President Bush's new Agriculture Secretary, and Lt. Gov. Dave Heineman succeeded
Johanns.
The Crystal Ball just returned from a trip to Nebraska, on the very day that GOP Congressman Tom Osborne, the famous former U of N
football coach, announced that he had decided to challenge Heineman in the Republican primary. While in the Cornhusker state, we were able
to survey a variety of politically knowledgeable people. Almost all expect Osborne to win the primary easily, and yet...every single one said
Heineman was a competent, fairly impressive governor, who is doing an energetic job. As such, some wondered whether the much older Osborne
would impress people on the campaign trail and in the debates.
The Crystal Ball believes that there is some chance--though less than 50 percent--that Heineman will upset Osborne. Usually, voters must
have a strong reason to oust an incumbent, even one who has not been elected to the office. But, these are not the usual circumstances.
We actually heard Heineman supporters, many of whom are concentrated in the Nebraska business community, suggest that Heineman should step down
and run for lieutenant governor for a term under Osborne, and then, after Osborne retires, Heineman could seek a full term as governor.
Indeed, Osborne has strongly hinted that he would probably serve only one four-year term. Of course, he could also change his mind, and
Heineman--who has worked his entire life to get to the governor's office--could be in servitude for a seemingly eternal period.
Even though Nebraska can already be safely put in the Republican column (publishing executive David Hahn is the only Democrat to have
declared his candidacy), this primary will be one of the most fascinating in the country. This is an odd situation with few precedents
anywhere, but football really matters in Nebraska (as it does in Texas).
|
No matter who emerges victorious from this primary, this race is a strong GOP hold.
Check out more on Nebraska here.
posted by Scott Elliott at 2:45pm 02/02/06 ::
link
|
| Wednesday, February 1, 2006 |
|---|
| Happy 18th birthday, Conner!! |
| It is hard to believe, but my eldest son turned 18 today. We celebrated by going to
the N.C. State-Virginia basketball game. It was a thrilling 66-64 Wolfpack victory!
Consequently, I did not get the preview for Nebraska up. Conner said he had a wonderful b-day, so I
hope everyone will be patient with me. I'll try to get it posted tomorrow.
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:55pm 02/01/06 ::
link
|
|
|
| Election Projection Resources |
EP's RSS Feed |
RSS
|
| 2010 Projection Results |
|
| 2008 Projection Results |
|
| 2006 Projection Results |
|
| 2004 Projection Results |
|
| Search this site |
provided by Google
|
| Contact Me |
e-mail Scott at: thebloggingcaesar -at- yahoo.com
|
|
|