|
Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here. Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.
|
| Archives |
May, 2012
April, 2012
March, 2012
February, 2012
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| |
|---|
| Tuesday, January 19, 2010 |
|---|
| The stakes in Massachusetts are higher now for the GOP |
Three weeks ago, when Republican Scott Brown's momentum was just starting to build, the thought of a Republican winning Ted Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts was as outlandish as, well, a
Republican winning Ted Kennedy's seat in Massachusetts. Yes, I repeat myself, but the illustration is effective. Indeed, a GOPer in Ted Kennedy's seat epitomizes
outlandishness. As we moved into the new year, however, polls showed Brown closing on Democratic candidate Martha Coakley.
Last year, polls gave Coakley large 25-30 points leads. By early January, the margin in some polls was down to single digits. Excitement on the right gathered steam as folks
began to wonder if the GOP could make a race of it. At that time, even a close loss for Brown was seen as a win. This is, after all, Massachusetts.
But the momentum didn't stop when Brown got close. Last week, polls started showing Brown ahead, some even giving him a healthy lead of 10 points or more. And the
energy, both anecdotal and measured, appeared to be all in Brown's corner. All of a sudden, with just a couple days remaining, Brown looked like the favorite to win. Now, on
Election Day, the landscape has completely changed from late last year. Instead of this being a sure victory for the Democrat, expectations in most circles are that Brown will win.
As expectations have changed, so have the stakes for the GOP. Early on, even a close Brown defeat would have been seen as a repudiation of Democrats on Capitol
Hill and their corrupt power management and a negative referendum on Obamcare. But with expectations of a Brown victory the current conventional wisdom, a close Brown defeat
becomes spinnable for the Democrats.
If Coakley wins, Democrats will be able to say that they took a Republican blindside - took their best shot - and emerged victorious all the same. And after
President Obama's visit here on Sunday, he'll be able to tout his "coming to the rescue" of an endangered Democrat. As John Zogby said on a recent Sean Hannity radio
show, a Coakley victory will enable Obama to use that message to assuage the fears of other Democrats contemplating retirement. Of course, how effective they are in resonating
that spin remains to be seen, and the GOP will for sure be touting any result today as an indication of voter angst with Obama and the Democrats. However, the change of
expectations will undoubtedly reduce the 'punch' that message would have had in the absence of Brown's major late-game surge.
Bottom line: A Brown win today will be a huge victory for Republicans in so many ways. It will energize the Republican base, facilitate GOP candidate recruitment,
dampen Democratic recruitment, and most likely produce a greater number of Democratic retirements - if Massachusetts can fall, who can be considered safe? And that's just looking
at the elections in November. The GOP - and the nation, in this blogger's opinion - will benefit tangibly by regaining the power to filibuster the Democrats' agenda in the
Senate. Before the GOP enthusiasm tsunami hit the Bay State, a close loss would have still provided the GOP with much of these same advantages. Now that Brown has
become the de facto favorite, not so much. The events of the last six weeks have transformed this race - as a matter of perception - from a no-lose situation to a win-lose
battle that the GOP really needs to win.
Filed under:
Senate
Massachusetts
MA Senate
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:19am 01/19/10::
link
|
|
|
|
|
| Election Projection Resources |
EP's RSS Feed |
RSS
|
| 2010 Projection Results |
|
| 2008 Projection Results |
|
| 2006 Projection Results |
|
| 2004 Projection Results |
|
| Search this site |
provided by Google
|
| Contact Me |
e-mail Scott at: thebloggingcaesar -at- yahoo.com
|
|
|