Home  Blog  Election Polls  President 2012  Senate 2012  House 2012  Governors 2012  GOP Primaries 2012  Redistricting 2012  Formulas  Results  About me


    "The Blogging Caesar at Election Projection is one of the web's best prognosticators" - Hugh Hewitt

2012 Projections


Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here.  Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.


April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003

  Politics and Elections
March 5, 2004
Bush ads approved by 9/11 victims
The title to this post is true, yet biased.  I phrased it that way to make a point.  There is an article out by Reuters that illustrates the power of spin in influencing reader perception.  The article is entitled Victims' Families Press Bush to Pull 9/11 Ads.  There is nothing untruthful about those words.  However if you read the article, you'll also read these words:
New Yorker Debra Burlingame, whose brother Charles was the captain on the plane that crashed into the Pentagon, said she supports the ads given the current foreign policy climate.

"The ads are very positive," Burlingame, a registered Democrat, said in an interview. "It's a huge issue and to say that President Bush can't talk about it is preposterous.

"It's not like these images are being used to tear down his opponents, but to point out that this is his top priority."

Of course, you'll read this, too:
"As a firefighter who spent months at Ground Zero, it's deeply offensive to see the Bush campaign use these images to capitalize on the greatest American tragedy of our time," New York firefighter Tom Ryan said at a news conference.
Here's another one: "September 11 families say Bush campaign treading on the dead".  Seems very odd to me, but if you read that article, you'll see this:
"It speaks to the truth of the times," said Jennie Farrell, who lost her brother in the attacks.  "September 11 was something beyond the realm of imagination, and George Bush . . . led us through one of the darkest moments in history."
I applaud giving expression to both sides of an issue.  At least these articles do quote detractors and supporters alike.  However, their use of language in the titles reveals their true intent and bias.

Finally, leave it The New York Times to cast aside any pretense of objectivity.  Again from the second article:
The New York Times stepped into the debate Friday, with an editorial that defined the overriding memories of September 11 as those of heroism and loss.

"Any political candidate who attempts to piggyback onto those emotions deserves to be shunned by the electorate," the Times said.

Does anyone believe the Times would have published those words if a Democrat occupied the White House?  Get real!

George W. Bush has led this country with steadfast, principled resolve through terrible tragedy.  He should be able to reflect on that as he makes his case for keeping his job.  The Democrats and liberals in this country can't let that happen.  They know Bush will win hands down when the tragedy and his response to it are placed front and center before the electorate.

I can't know the mind of others, but, in my estimation, the efforts of the Kerry campaign and the liberal media to keep these ads from touching the hearts of voters is motivated much more by the desire to win politically than the desire to avoid defaming the memory of the lost.  They are the ones attempting to use the tragedy to their political advantage.  President Bush, by contrast, is simply asking Americans to remember the enemy we face, in all its ugly, murderous robes, and to let him continue the fight against that enemy.  In the end, our President and our country are fighting this war, not only for our national security, but also to honor the sacrifice of those who perished.  As Ms. Burlingame so apty stated, it is his top priority.

posted by Scott Elliott at 3:30pm 03/05/04 ::
<< Previous Politics and Election News Next >>

Special Thanks To:

Charlie Cook
Cook Political

Congressional Quarterly
CQ Politics

D.C. Finegold Sachs
DC's Political Report

Dave Leip
U.S. Election Atlas

David Wissing
The Hedgehog Report

Larry Sabato
Crystal Ball

Richard & Tony
The Green Papers

Rose Institute
Redistricting in America

Tom Bevan and John McIntyre

Election Projection Resources
EP's RSS Feed

Search this site

provided by Google
Contact Me

e-mail Scott at:
gmail <put a period here> com

©Copyright 2003-2013 Scott Elliott, All Rights Reserved