|
Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here. Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.
|
| Archives |
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| - September, 2009 |
|---|
| Thursday, September 24, 2009 |
|---|
| VA Gov: Deeds' admission may stall momentum |
There are two important statehouse races that will be decided this November - Virginia and New Jersey. In the Old Dominion, the GOP is hopeful of recapturing the governorship after
suffering several high-profile statewide losses over the last two or three election cycles. Polls until recently showed the Republican candidate, Bob McDonnell, with comfortable
margins over Democratic candidate, Creigh Deeds. Last week, however, Rasmussen's survey of the race
indicated movement in Deeds' favor.
As late as two weeks ago, McDonnell held a nine-point advantage according to Rasmussen. In this latest poll, Deeds was behind by only two. Clearly the race has tightened -
at least until Deeds pulled a classic Walter Mondale maneuver in yesterday's Washington Post.
In the op-ed, Deeds expressed his willingness and intent to
raise taxes to meet his transportation plan's goals.
| Let me be clear regarding taxes. I will sign a bill that is the product of bipartisan compromise that provides a comprehensive
transportation solution. As a legislator, I have voted for a number of mechanisms to fund transportation, including a gas tax. And I'll sign a bipartisan bill with a dedicated funding mechanism for transportation - even if it includes new taxes.
|
Bill Pascoe, whose article at CQPolitics I linked to in today's political Quick Hits section, feels the revelation is
"suicidal" and believes it hands the race to McDonnell. While my view is not so drastic, I do think McDonnell has been given a powerful tool to work to his advantage. Here's
why.
While Virginia has moved measurably to the blue end of the spectrum over the last 10 years, much of the state remains deep red. The influx of more liberal-leaning folks into
the Washington/Richmond/Norfolk corridor has transformed northern and eastern Virginia into a bluish substate. At the same time, vast swaths of the state west and south of Richmond
have held onto their ruby red tradition. The result renders Virginia more a blue and red state than a purple one. In addition, the larger, predominantly-red areas to the west
and south are much less urban than the more-concentrated blue pockets to the north and east. This combination of delimiters is what makes Deeds' op-ed statements damaging
and potentially fatal to his gubernatorial aspirations month after next.
Confessing the willingness to raise taxes is probably not the best idea in a battleground state like Virginia, but the expressed desired to raise taxes to fix transportation issues may
be particularly acrid to voters in less urban, GOP strongholds already energized by the first 9 months of Obama's presidency. McDonnell would be well-served to broadcast Deed's
admission often, long and loudly across the southern Piedmont and western mountain regions of the state. Turnout in these areas has not kept up with other side of the state
in recent elections. If McDonnell and the GOP will make these voters aware of what they face in terms of higher taxes for transportation "fixes" if Deeds were to win, I believe
McDonnell will benefit from a massive turnout - relatively-speaking for this off-year election - large enough to provide a winning margin over Deeds in November.
Filed under:
Governors - 2009
Virginia - 2009
VA Governor - 2009
posted by Scott Elliott at 2:27pm 09/24/09::
link
|
|
| Wednesday, September 23, 2009 |
|---|
| MO Senate: Blunt (R) 46, Carnahan (D) 46 |
In what is sure to be one of the most hotly-contested and hard fought senate races next year, Republican Roy Blunt is tied with Democrat Robin Carnahan according to the latest
Rasmussen poll out of Missouri. Both candidates garner 46% support in the poll. Interestingly, only 5% of those polled are undecided - even though we're still have almost 14
months of campaigning left. Low voter indecision in this race can be attributed to the familiarity Missourans have with the two candidates. Each candidate has a strong political
resume and a prominent family name in Missouri's political circles.
Blunt has been a member of the United States House of Representatives since 1997 and, as minority whip, has held the number two GOP position in the House. His son, Matt,
recently served as Missouri's governor. Carnahan is Missouri's current Secretary of State and daughter of Mel Carnahan, a former governor who was tragically killed while campaigning
for a senate seat and Jean Carnahan, who was appointed senator after her husband won that election posthumously.
With two strong candidates in a battleground state known for close statewide elections, Missouri's senate contest next year should be fun to watch. Some folks have listed it
as one of the more likely senate seats to switch hands next November - and well it may - but to The Blogging Caesar, this race will be true tossup all the way to Election Day.
Filed under:
Senate
Missouri
MO Senate
posted by Scott Elliott at 3:58pm 09/23/09::
link
|
| Sunday, September 20, 2009 |
|---|
| Generic ballot poll tightening - updated |
Last Tuesday, Rasmussen Reports released their
weekly congressional generic ballot poll. After several
weeks of substantial leads, the GOP didn't fare as well in this latest edition. Forty-one percent still favored the GOP against just 40% for the Democrats, but the margin is well within
the margin of error. The next release of this poll should be on Tuesday. I'll keep an eye on that one to see if the tightening has any staying power or if it was just a statistical
anomaly.
Update: This week's poll has been published. The GOP's advantage stands at 4 points. That's an improvement from last week but doesn't
match the 7-point leads they enjoyed previously. Rasmussen offers this explanation of the movement in the numbers over the last two surveys.
|
President Obama's speech to Congress two weeks ago may have contributed heavily to last week's surge in Democratic support since it also drove up support for his health care plan and
gave his job approval ratings a modest boost.
|
Time will tell if the lingering boost will persist in the coming weeks or if the GOP will assume an outside-of-the-margin-of-error advantage once again. With opposition to Obamacare
reaching a new high, chances are the GOP will
see improvement in this mesurement.
Filed under:
Generic ballot
House
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:08pm 09/20/09::
link
|
| Saturday, September 12, 2009 |
|---|
| Myrtle Beach, here we come! - updated2 |
My family and I are headed off to the Grand Strand in South Carolina for a week of much-needed R and R. We're leaving after Sunday School tomorrow morning and won't be back
until next Sunday! Needless to say, there won't be much in the way of updates while we're gone. However, now that I have my blogposting software running well, I might be tempted to
use it if I get some alone time down there.
Update on the website rework: I've completed converting all the previous content to the new format. You may have already noticed some of the changes. Each
post now has it's own page with the title in the URL and in the browser title bar. These particular changes were made with search engine optimization in mind. But, that's not all
that I have in the works. For one, Mrs. Blogging Caesar will soon be getting in the blogging business treating such subjects as health, nutrition, gluten and other food allergies, as well
other health issues. And I will be adding to the topics I blog about too. So, look for an expanded array of choices for your reading pleasure in the coming weeks.
Update: Since I need to do a little more testing on my blogposter program, I thought I'd use the opportunity to explain a little bit about it. Election Projection
involves a lot of gadgets and formats which make it difficult to incorporate blogposting software such as wordpress for someone of my limited knowledge in that area. So, to solve
that problem, I've written a program to do that kind of thing for me - in a language, C++, that I do have experience with. Well, here goes my test of the "Updating" function...
Update2: We are back from the beach. The family and I had a GREAT time! Lots of miniature golf, swimming and eating. The weather stayed
nice until the very end - even though the forecast predicted showers during the latter part of the week. Now back to blogging...
Filed under:
Website administration
The Blogging Caesar
posted by Scott Elliott at 2:54pm 09/12/09::
link
|
| Monday, September 7, 2009 |
|---|
| Website rework underway |
Please bear with me over the next week as I rework some aspects of the website. Actually, I'm pretty much gutting most of it in favor of a simpler and more
search-engine-optimized architecture. But the look and feel won't change much to the reader. Most of the changes are of the "behind-the-scenes" variety. While the
changes are ongoing, you may experience some broken links and other inconveniences. Your patience is much appreciated during this transition.
Filed under:
Website administration
posted by Scott Elliott at 12:31am 09/07/09 ::
link
|
| Tuesday, September 1, 2009 |
|---|
| US foreign policy way off toward Honduras |
Some of you know that I spent several years as a teenager in Central America, mostly in Honduras. The time there is a wonderful memory which I will always
treasure. Honduras and her people hold a special place in my heart. One of the many characteristics I have always loved about the country is the
people's desire for peace and representative government. From my earliest recollections, Honduras has been a
model of Latin American democracy. But that admirable trait has landed it on the wrong side of the Obama administration and its brand of U.S. foreign
policy.
Aided by the slanted,
disingenuous
coverage of our stateside media, Obama's team has
been allowed to perpetuate a lie about recent events there which have tested Honduran resolve to maintain the democratic process they have come to
cherish. According to mainstream media accounts, this two-month-long saga has been an unjustified subjugation of democracy in which an overzealous
military "rousted Honduran President Zelaya from his bed at gunpoint and whisked him away--in his pajamas--to Costa Rica." Honduras is now, they say,
"deeply divided" and, they warn, "could easily spin out of control."
In order to punish the wayward beneficiaries of the military coup, the United States government has threatened to suspend aid to Honduras, and the U.S
State Department announced last week that it would provide
only emergency Visa service at the U.S. embassy in
Tegucigalpa. No non-emergency Visa requests will be considered.
Hold on now! How about a little dose of reality? The truth about the "coup" differs enormously from the tales coming from the press and the White House. But these tales persist, not because the truth has been hidden, but because they fit the socialist template these liberal strongholds require. To find the truth, one need look no further than a detailed account provided by the new president of Honduras in a recent
Wall Street Journal Op-ed. In this brilliant, clear
and methodical telling of the events leading up to President Zelaya's ouster, interim President Roberto Micheletti lays out exactly why Zelaya had to be removed.
You should go read the whole thing, but in case you
don't, let me include here Micheletti's list of key undisputed facts. I have highlighted for emphasis much of these important bullets.
|
The Supreme Court, by a 15-0 vote, found that Mr. Zelaya had acted illegally by proceeding with an unconstitutional "referendum," and it ordered the
Armed Forces to arrest him. The military executed the arrest order of the Supreme Court because it was the appropriate agency to do so under
Honduran law.
|
Think about how many decisions our own Supreme Court reaches unanimously. To frame this in terms we Americans might understand, this decision is akin
to our Supreme Court ruling 9-0 for either Al Gore or George W. Bush in the Florida debacle during the presidential election in 2000. And how much more
legitimate could this verdict be considering a majority of the judges are from Zelaya's own party?
|
Eight of the 15 votes on the Supreme Court were cast by members of Mr. Zelaya's own Liberal Party. Strange that the pro-Zelaya
propagandists who talk about the rule of law forget to mention the unanimous Supreme Court decision with a majority from Mr. Zelaya's own party. Thus, Mr.
Zelaya's arrest was at the instigation of Honduran's constitutional and civilian authorities - not the military.
|
To say this was a coup orchestrated by a military out of control could not be more wrong. The Honduran government took exactly the proper path to this
end and did so under the full support of Honduran law.
|
The Honduran Congress voted overwhelmingly in support of removing Mr. Zelaya. The vote included a majority of members of Mr. Zelaya's Liberal
Party.
|
The Honduran legislature supported removing Zelaya from power - when would a majority of congressional Republicans support the impeachment of, say, George W.
Bush? Or when would a majority of congressional Democrats support the impeachment of, say, Barack Obama? I'll tell you when - when it is beyond
debate that either did something so wrong that the very foundation of our democracy could not withstand it.
|
Independent government and religious leaders and institutions - including the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, the Administrative Law Tribunal, the independent Human Rights Ombudsman,
four-out-of-five political parties, the two major presidential candidates of the Liberal and National Parties, and Honduras' Catholic Cardinal - all agreed that Mr. Zelaya had acted illegally.
|
Illegally, yes, but so wrong that this drastic course of action was necessary? Absolutely...
|
The constitution expressly states in Article 239 that any president who seeks to amend the constitution and extend his term is automatically disqualified and is no longer president. There is no express provision for an impeachment process in the Honduran constitution. But the
Supreme Court's unanimous decision affirmed that Mr. Zelaya was attempting to extend his term with his illegal referendum. Thus, at the time of his
arrest he was no longer - as a matter of law, as far as the Supreme Court was concerned - president of Honduras.
|
Zelaya's actions constituted a breach of democracy so dire that they immediately rendered him Honduras' former president. And that declaration
comes directly from the constitution of Honduras. So what kind of man would so blatantly trash his native land's democratic process? This kind...
|
Days before his arrest, Mr. Zelaya had his chief of staff illegally withdraw millions of dollars in cash from the Central Bank of Honduras.
|
But where did this perverted thirst for power come from? This total disregard for the rule of law? Keep reading.
|
A day or so before his arrest, Mr. Zelaya led a violent mob to overrun an Air Force base to seize referendum ballots that had been shipped into Honduras by
Hugo Chavez's Venezuelan government.
|
Therein lies the answer. Zelaya's decent into Chavez-like behavior was ushered in by none other than Hugo Chavez, himself, America's loudest, foulest, and
most brazen hater among the leaders of Latin America and friend of one,
Barack Obama? (The picture is becoming clear now, isn't it?)
If you care to see just what measure of influence Chavez has had on Zelaya, you can
read this article. Chavez seduced the
former right-of-center former president with the mother's milk of politics. Again, my emphasis added.
|
Zelaya took office in 2006 as the leader of one of the two center-right parties that have dominated Honduran politics for decades. His general platform, his
support for the Central American Free Trade Agreement with the United States and his alliances with business organizations gave no inkling of the fact that halfway
into his term he would become a political cross-dresser.
Suddenly, in 2007, he declared himself a socialist and began to establish close ties with Venezuela. In December of that year, he incorporated
Honduras into Petrocaribe, a mechanism set up by Hugo Chavez for lavishing oil subsidies on Latin American and Caribbean countries in exchange for political
subservience. Then his government joined the Bolivarian Alternative for Latin America and the Caribbean (ALBA), Venezuela's answer to the proposed
Free Trade Area of the Americas, ostensibly a commercial alliance but in practice a political conspiracy that seeks to expand populist dictatorship to the rest of Latin America.
Last year, following the script originally laid out by Chavez in Venezuela and adopted by Evo Morales in Bolivia and Rafael Correa in Ecuador, Zelaya
announced that he would hold a referendum to set up a constituent assembly that would change the constitution that barred him from reelection. |
So what can we conclude from all this? First, I believe a hearty handshake and pat on the back - as well as a heartfelt debt of democracy-driven gratitude -
is owed to the Honduran government for their flawless handling of Zelaya's Chavez imitation. At each step, they were right, proper and completely
above reproach. It is a pity that they and the people of Honduras must be subjected to retribution at our hand for such courageous and noble actions.
Second, it's hard not to conclude that the Obama administration's foreign policy designs are firmly planted in cultivating solid, friendly relationships with socialist
totalitarians. President Zelaya, along with Mr. Chavez, looked to be another potential member of Obama's diplomatic inner circle. Now that the
democratic process in Honduras has attempted to remove that possibility, Obama's government seems ready to use whatever it can to restore Zelaya to the
socialist dictatorial fold.
As I end, let me insert the last bullet in President Micheletti's list of undisputed facts.
|
I succeeded Mr. Zelaya under the Honduran constitution's order of succession (our vice president had resigned before all of this began so that he could run for president).
This is and has always been an entirely civilian government. The military was ordered by an entirely civilian Supreme Court to arrest Mr. Zelaya. His removal was ordered by an
entirely civilian and elected Congress. To suggest that Mr. Zelaya was ousted by means of a military coup is demonstrably false.
|
But it, nevertheless, continues to be the falsehood of choice for Obama and the American media.
Filed under:
Honduras
President Obama
Foreign Policy
Hugo Chavez
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:31pm 09/01/09 ::
link
|
|
|
| Election Projection Resources |
EP's RSS Feed |
RSS
|
| 2010 Projection Results |
|
| 2008 Projection Results |
|
| 2006 Projection Results |
|
| 2004 Projection Results |
|
| Search this site |
provided by Google
|
| Contact Me |
e-mail Scott at: thebloggingcaesar -at- yahoo.com
|
|
|