Home  Blog  Election Polls  President 2012  Senate 2012  House 2012  Governors 2012  GOP Primaries 2012  Redistricting 2012  Formulas  Results  About me


 

 
         
    "The Blogging Caesar at Election Projection is one of the web's best prognosticators" - Hugh Hewitt

2012 Projections

President
Senate
House
Governors



Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here.  Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.


Favorite Links

Hugh Hewitt
Townhall
Hot Air
Michelle Malkin
TheGatewayPundit
PoliPundit
Viking Pundit
RealClearPolitics
Confederate Yankee
Sister Toldjah
PollingReport
Betsy's Page
Right Wing News
Crystal Ball
Atlas of US Elections
OnTheIssues.org
Sell Oil and Gas Royalties

Blogroll

The Anchoress
Baldilocks
California Yankee
Daily Pundit
Dividend Reinvestment Plans
DANEgerous
Daniel Drezner
InstaPundit
Intellectual Conservative
Kim Priestap
La Shawn Barber
Mark Steyn
Michael Totten
Michelle Malkin
Murdoc Online
Mystery Pollster
One Hand Clapping
Outside the Beltway
Political Dog 101
PoliticalWire
Powerline
RedState
Right-Thinking
The Strata-Sphere
The Volokh Conspiracy
Wizbang!

Archives

April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003


  Politics and Elections
   The Democratic Party
Monday, April 11, 2011
On budget deals and spending cuts
The government shutdown has been averted at the expense of, some conservatives argue, the leverage we earned last November.  I don't know about that, but I do believe we would have risked a powerful backlash had a compromise not been reached.  While it is true that this is not 1995, I'm still persuaded that the mainstream media's spin would have effectively pinned the fault of a government shutdown on the Republicans.  So, in that sense, I'm not opposed to the deal - especially since the economic policy debate now centers around how much we will cut, not how much more we'll spend.  This is a small but important tipping point.  And, to be sure, one that would never have been reached if control of Congress still resided with the Democrats.

It speaks volumes about the Democrats' mindset that even with our government's endless and growing expanse of debt, Republicans had to haggle until the final hour and finally compromise to avoid a government shutdown...just to cut 0.1% (that's one one-thousandth) of its insanely bloated budget.



Filed under:  Budget  The Democratic Party  The Republican Party 



posted by Scott Elliott at 3:00pm 04/11/11::

Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Startling evidence of how bad it may be in November
Until now, I have been worried that the GOP may not realize the potential gains in Congress that appear to be there for the taking. Sure, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid are disliked by the voting public.  Their approval ratings are dismal.  But, then I look at the approval ratings of Mitch McConnell and John Boehner.  Theirs are much worse.  Polling is all over the place.  And sometimes I fear the Tea Party movement is overreaching (e.g.: Sharron Angle) and providing the liberal media with plentiful ammunition to paint the GOP as way too radical for mainstream America.

Until now, that is.

I feel quite a bit differently today after stumbling across the most important and telling poll I've seen in this cycle.  The poll tests the 60 Democratic and 10 Republican House seats deemed to be the most vulnerable.  The findings are nothing short of remarkable.  From the top line numbers to the in depth analysis, the survey reveals an overwhelming red wave barreling its way toward November 2nd.

I'm going to evaluate and respond to several aspects of the poll's results, but before that, I want to let the Democratic polling firm Greenberg Quinlan Rosner react to their own work.  (Actually, they collaborated with a Republican counterpart, Public Opinion Strategies, in conducting the poll.)  Here's part of what GQR had to say.

The results are a wake-up call for Democrats whose losses in the House could well exceed 30 seats.  In the named-congressional ballot in the 60 Democratic districts, Democrats trail their Republican opponent, 42 to 47 percent, with only a third saying they want to vote to re-elect their member.  In the top tier of 30 most competitive seats, the Democratic candidate trails by 9 points (39 to 48 percent) and by 2 points in the next tier of 30 seats (45 to 47 percent).  On the other hand, the Republican candidates are running well ahead in their most competitive seats (53 to 37 percent).
With an aggregate 9-point deficit, the Democrats will be hard-pressed not to lose 90% or more of their thirty most vulnerable seats.  Among the second tier 30, a 2-point GOP lead would translate to roughly 16 seats or so more.  That's 27 and 16.  Forty-three.  On the Republican side, these numbers indicate that truly vulnerable GOP seats are practically non-existent.  Looking at individual Republican seats, however, it's clear that a couple are very likely to end up in the Democratic column after Election Day.  So, we'll subtract three from the takeover count.  That leaves a 40-seat net gain for Republicans.  It also adds up to a GOP majority, folks.

But there's more to be happy in this survey if you like red political maps.  Again, from GQR's own analysis.

62 percent of Republicans in Democratic districts describe themselves as very enthusiastic about the upcoming election.  That compares with 37 percent of Democrats in those same districts.
This is more compelling evidence that polls measuring registered voters are missing the true picture - badly.  A twenty-five point enthusiasm gap is monumental.  It will prove to be much too much for many a Democratic incumbent to overcome.

But the good news doesn't end there.  Beyond an enthusiasm gap, these Democratic districts are witnessing a mass exodus from Democratic candidates.  In 2008, survey respondents in blue districts voted for the Democratic congressional candidate by double-digit margins in both Tier 1 (48-37%) and Tier 2 (50-35%) races.  Computing the difference between those numbers and the poll's findings for 2010, Republicans enjoy 20-point and 17-point improvements in Tier 1 and Tier 2 districts, respectively.

So what's driving this enthusiasm, and is it sustainable?  According to Talking Points Memo's analysis of the survey, unless Democrats change their narrative on the issues or succeed in winning back voters to their way of thinking, these numbers are not likely to change in their favor.  Republicans win hands down not just as un-Democrats, but as better alternatives on the issues.

The poll of 60 Dem-held districts and 10 GOP-held districts found voters across the board favoring Republican candidates on the generic ballot tests, as well as agreeing more with Republican messages on the economy, health care and other issues.
These findings are remarkable not just for the rosy picture they paint for Republicans in November, but also in the depth of distaste voters have for the policies of the current administration and its cohorts on Capitol Hill.  With less than 5 month's to go until the first tangible referendum on Obama's presidency, signs point unmistakably to a fundamental and substantial shift toward the GOP and more conservative policies.  Job approval of sitting incumbents in these districts further illustrates that the mood out there is anti-Democrat, not so much anti-incumbent.  Those approving of their congressman's performance in Democrat-held districts are just 40% with 38% disapproving.  In Republican-held areas, voter approval of the incumbent is 22% greater than voter disapproval (54% to 32%).  That hardly fits an anti-incumbent message.

Clearly, after experiencing the effects of complete Democratic control in Washington for the last 18 months, voters seem eager to give Republicans another chance in 2010.



Filed under:  2010 Elections  House  The Republican Party  The Democratic Party 



posted by Scott Elliott at 11:56pm 06/16/10::
Monday, June 14, 2010
NC CD-2: We need to defeat this guy - updated2
Last month, I interviewed Renee Ellmers.  She's the GOP nominee running against Democrat Bob Etheridge in North Carolina's 2nd District.  I'm a big fan of Ms. Ellmers and her stances on limited government and personal responsibility.  I'm rooting hard for her to defeat Mr. Etheridge and his lock step support of the Obama/Reid/Pelosi triumvirate.

Apparently, though, it is more than his ideology that puts him at odds with me and most of his constituents.  A video on YouTube reveals that he also harbors an elitest abrasive streak.  You really need to watch this clip of the congressman's interaction with students on a Washington DC sidewalk.  We can do better than that.  We need to defeat Bob Etheridge.

Update:  You can help elect Renee by clicking here and contributing what you can.

Update2:  John Hawkins at Right Wing News has Renee's press release in response to Etheridge's actions.



Filed under:  Adopt-a-race, NC-2  The Democratic Party  House  North Carolina  NC House 



posted by Scott Elliott at 3:31pm 06/14/10::
Friday, February 12, 2010
Voters may abandon Democrats, but Republicans still tarnished
David Hogberg, journalist at the online Investor's Business Daily, has written a good examination of the current mood of the electorate 10 months away from November's midterm elections.  While he was researching for the article, Hogberg asked me to chat with him about my thoughts on the GOP brand and how it will impact probable GOP gains this year.  I'm not going to spill the beans and tell you what I said - you'll just have to go read the article.



Filed under:  The Democratic Party  The Republican Party  The Blogging Caesar 



posted by Scott Elliott at 7:25pm 02/12/10::
Monday, February 8, 2010
Rep. John Murtha dead at 77
Democratic Congressman John Murtha has died from gall bladder surgery complications.  Regardless of the political idealogy of the man, tragedies like this are unwanted and sad.  My heart and prayers go out this evening to his family and friends.  May they be comforted during this difficult time.  An appropriate time will come to examine what his passing means for the balance of power in the House; now is not that time.



Filed under:  The Democratic Party 



posted by Scott Elliott at 6:45pm 02/08/10::
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
That's not a deficit!
There's a famous scene in the first Crocodile Dundee movie where Dundee and his female companion are accosted by a knife-wielding mugger while walking alone at night.  The companion shrieks, "He's got a knife!"   To which Dundee replies confidently, "That's not a knife!" and as he pulls out a mega blade from its sheath by his side, he says proudly, "That's a knife!"

Now that President Obama's first deficit has been adjusted even further up, echos of folks complaining about the budget deficits during the Bush years ring in my mind.  Sure, we ran up enormous, never-before-seen deficits during those years, and I won't even try to justify them.  Nevertheless, at $455 billion at their height, those deficits pale in comparison to the $1.6 TRILLION deficit we are projected to swallow this fiscal year.

It is illustrative, I think, to restage that scene for this issue.  In our little re-enactment, Obama plays the part of Dundee, Bush stands in as the thug (I know my liberal readers will like that thought!), and we, the American People, are the female companion.  There we are walking hand-in-hand with President Obama, when out springs Bush brandishing his $455 billion deficit, "Eek! He's got a deficit!" we scream in dismay.  But our strong and confident Obama retorts eloquently, "That's not a deficit!"  And unsheathing his own deficit - all $1.6 TRILLION of it - he smiles and says, "THAT'S A DEFICIT!"



Filed under:  President Obama  Budget deficit



posted by Scott Elliott at 2:34pm 08/26/09 ::

Special Thanks To:

Charlie Cook
Cook Political


Congressional Quarterly
CQ Politics


D.C. Finegold Sachs
DC's Political Report


Dave Leip
U.S. Election Atlas


David Wissing
The Hedgehog Report


Larry Sabato
Crystal Ball


Richard & Tony
The Green Papers


Rose Institute
Redistricting in America


Tom Bevan and John McIntyre
RealClearPolitics

Election Projection Resources
 
EP's RSS Feed

RSS Feed  RSS
Search this site

provided by Google
Contact Me

e-mail Scott at:
electionprojection-at-
gmail <put a period here> com
 

©Copyright 2003-2013 Scott Elliott, All Rights Reserved