|
Election Projection cannot screen all advertisements appearing here. Therefore, I do not necessarily endorse the products and/or services shown.
|
| Archives |
January, 2012
December, 2011
November, 2011
October, 2011
September, 2011
August, 2011
July, 2011
June, 2011
April, 2011
March, 2011
February, 2011
January, 2011
November, 2010
October, 2010
September, 2010
August, 2010
July, 2010
June, 2010
May, 2010
April, 2010
March, 2010
February, 2010
January, 2010
December, 2009
November, 2009
October, 2009
September, 2009
August, 2009
June, 2009
May, 2009
April, 2009
March, 2009
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
November, 2004
October, 2004
September, 2004
August, 2004
July, 2004
June, 2004
May, 2004
April, 2004
March, 2004
February, 2004
January, 2004
December, 2003
|
|
| |
|---|
| 2010 Elections - Pennsylvania Senate Race |
|---|
| Monday, May 31, 2010 |
|---|
| Rating change: PA Senate - Sestak moves ahead of Toomey |
There have been two polls out of Pennsylvania since Joe Sestak dethroned turncoat Arlen Specter in the Democratic primary. Both have him slightly ahead of GOP nominee Pat
Toomey. After the first, a Rasmussen poll giving Sestak a 46-42 lead, Toomey still maintained the lead here at EP. However, that lead could not withstand another blow - Research 2000's latest survey which has Sestak ahead by 3. So, the Keystone State's Senate seat up for grabs this year is now projected
to remain in Democratic hands. The change reduces projected GOP gains in the upper
chamber to 6 and results in a projected tally of 51 Democrats, 47 Republicans and 2 Independents.
Filed under:
Ratings changes
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
posted by Scott Elliott at 9:05pm 05/31/10::
link
|
|
| Wednesday, May 19, 2010 |
|---|
| Pennsylvania primary results - race tracking initiated |
Pennsylvania held the headliner election yesterday. Two races here captured the attention of the entire nation, and the outcomes have political observers everywhere debating their
significance heading toward November's midterm elections. Joe Sestak closed out Arlen Specter for the Democratic Senate nomination, and Democrat Mark Critz won easily over Tim
Burns to retain John Murtha's seat in the House for the blue team.
On a night when expectations of GOP fans were running high, both these results were good for Democrats.
Sestak's win gives them a stronger candidate in the general election against Republican nominee Pat Toomey. And, aside from the obvious benefit of a seat held, Critz's victory will
fuel optimism among Democratic observers that the alleged red wave coming in November may not be as strong as advertised.
I believe that thinking is premature and ignores the
impact the blockbuster battle that was Sestak vs. Specter had on Democratic turnout. While Specter's base in Philadelphia and suburbs were nominal at best, Sestak was very strong
in western PA, wracking up 15 to 20 point victories in some counties - including several of the 8 counties which hold at least of sliver of the gerrymandered 12th. I interpret these numbers as an indication of an anti-incumbent mood that drove many Democrats to the polls and muted the anti-Democrat mood motivating Burns supporters. Looking forward, this
seat is still very vulnerable. As I posited in my primary preview on Monday, this seat is more likely to go to the GOP in November when Seatak will be battling Toomey instead of
Specter and independents will makeup a larger slice of the vote.
On to the winners...
Senate
| |
Democratic Primary Joe Sestak |
Republican Primary Pat Toomey |
Governor
| |
Democratic Primary Dan Onorato |
Republican Primary Tom Corbett |
District 3
| |
Democratic Primary Kathy Dahlkemper - inc |
Republican Primary Mike Kelly |
District 4
| |
Democratic Primary none |
Republican Primary Keith Rothfus |
District 6
| |
Democratic Primary Manan Trivedi |
Republican Primary Jim Gerlach - inc |
District 8
| |
Democratic Primary none |
Republican Primary Michael Fitzpatrick |
District 10
| |
Democratic Primary none |
Republican Primary Thomas Marino |
District 11
| |
Democratic Primary Paul Kanjorski - inc |
Republican Primary none |
District 12
| |
Democratic Primary Mark Critz |
Republican Primary Tim Burns |
District 13
| |
Democratic Primary none |
Republican Primary Carson Dee Adcock |
District 15
| |
Democratic Primary none |
Republican Primary Charles Dent - inc |
District 17
| |
Democratic Primary Tim Holden - inc |
Republican Primary Dave Argall |
District 19
| |
Democratic Primary none |
Republican Primary Todd Platts - inc |
|
The only rating change coming into the general election season in Pennsylvania impacts the gubernatorial race. Corbett leads Onorato by 6 points in the only recent poll testing the
two. That poll changes the projection from Weak GOP Gain to Mod GOP Gain.
With 12 total races on the tracking lists here at Election Projection, Pennsylvania state page
will be one stop you'll want to make often.
Filed under:
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
PA House
PA Governor
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:54pm 05/19/10::
link
|
| Monday, May 17, 2010 |
|---|
| May 18 primary predictions - PA, KY, AR, OR - updated |
Tomorrow four states will hold party primaries, and a special election will determine who serves out the rest of John Murtha's term in PA-12. Among the primary combatants are two
Democratis incumbents under serious fire. One, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, may lose his party's nomination; the other, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, is in a bit better position
heading into the primary. And, while her nomination is by no means secure, her prospects in the general election if she does prevail tomorrow are significantly less rosy.
Also capturing the attention of political observers are Kentucky's Senate primaries. Both parties are holding intriguing matches to decide who will battle for outgoing Republican
Senator Jim Bunning's seat. Democrats will choose between Lt. Governor Daniel Mongiardo and Attorney General Jack Conway. A few weeks ago, Mongiardo appeared to be
cruising to the nomination, leading by 15 points or more in the polls. That lead has shrunk to almost nothing in recent days, however, and Election Day will dawn with Conway having
a legitimate shot at a stunning come-from-behind victory.
On the Republican ballot, the son of Texas congressman and former GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul has moved well ahead of Kentucky Secretary of State Trey Grayson.
Rand Paul now seems set to earn the nomination tomorrow. Though both Grayson and Paul currently lead either Democrat in the polls, Grayson's margins are more
substantial, a fact that re-enforces doubts about Paul in some Republican circles. Time will tell how he connects with a general election electorate once the primaries have past.
Rounding out tomorrow's primary schedule is Oregon. The Democratic gubernatorial race features two prominent Oregon politicians in Secretary of State Bill Bradbury and
former Governor John Kitzhaber. The winner of that battle will enter the general election campaign as a decided favorite to succeed term-limited Democratic Governor Ted
Kulongowski.
Sometime tomorrow I post links to primary results so you can watch the returns come in. For now, let me venture a few predictions. In Pennsylvania, I predict Arlen
Specter's party-switching gambit will end in defeat and Joe Sestak will advance to face Pat Toomey in November. In PA-12, I have to give the slightest of edges to Democrat
Mark Critz (Election Projection's margin of victory: 0.5%). Turnout at the top of the ballot will propel Critz to a narrow win over Republican Tim Burns. In Arkansas,
Blanche Lincoln will survive by a margin you can fit on one hand. Finally, it'll be Rand Paul vs. Dan Mongiardo in Kentucky as Conway's frantic comeback bid falls just short.
I have to add that I'm least confident about the PA-12 prediction. Given the difficulty of polling House races in general and measuring turnout in this district specifically,
projecting a winner can be little more than guesswork. If Burns does pull it out, I think the ramifications for November will be great. A Burns victory despite heavy
get-out-the-vote motivation provided by the Specter/Sestak matchup will indicate just how much the enthusiasm gap truly favors the GOP.
Update: You can follow primary election returns here. Polls close in Kentucky at 6pm, in Pennsylvania at
8pm, in Arkansas at 8:30pm and in Oregon at 10pm. (All times EDT)
Filed under:
Arkansas
Kentucky
Oregon
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
PA House
KY Senate
posted by Scott Elliott at 11:01pm 05/17/10::
link
|
| Sunday, April 25, 2010 |
|---|
| Fifty state tour - Pennsylvania preview (part 2) |
House District 7: Democratic incumbent Joe Sestak has left this seat in search of the Senate seat currently held by turncoat Arlen Specter. First elected
in the blue wave year of 2006, Sestak's entrance and exit from the House is synchronized to the good fortunes of the Democratic Party, and he leaves a seat that will be difficult
at best for the Democrats to retain. The primary front runners are established for both parties and are nearly even in cash on hand. Combine that with the marginal
nature of this district, and you have a race that should be about tied all things being equal. But all things are not equal this year. I say the GOP tide will be
enough to upset the balance and give Republican Pat Meehan a Weak GOP Gain over Democrat Brian Lentz.
House District 8: Some districts, such as Pennsylvania's 4th, have races that seem to be moving toward the incumbent party candidate. Others have
the opposite feel. This district is an example of the latter. Initially thought of as safe, it has moved now to a Mod DEM Hold.
One main reason for the shift is Mike Fitzpatrick's decision to try again for the seat he won in 2004. Though Democratic incumbent Patrick Murphy ousted him just two
years later, Fitzpatrick brings to this race name recognition and the current letter-of-the-day after his name. He also brings the support of local Republican machinery
which should enable him to effectively play catch-up in the fundraising arena. It's true that Murphy has a substantial war chest ($1.3 million), but Fitzpatrick's $470,000
ain't too shabby, especially considering his late start relative to the incumbent. I predict this race will tighten before November, and, if the night meets moderate
expectations for the GOP, don't be surprised to count it among the list of Republican takeovers.
House District 10: This district has a legitimate rightward lean. Its Cook PVI is R+8. Incumbent Democrat Chris Carney has the
requisite "conservative" label attached to the D after his name, otherwise he probably would not be the incumbent right now. His victory in 2006 was largely due to the
sex scandal that was Don Sherwood's undoing, but he relied heavily on conservative credentials for his 2008 triumph. This year, his bid for a third term is a microcosm
of the political forces at work nationwide. Like so many other Democratic incumbents, he faces both the consequences of a yes vote for Obamacare and a
Republican candidate backed by Tea Party activists. Chiropractor David Madeira is just the type of novice candidate that could excite this conservative-leaning area no
doubt reeling from Carney's Obamacare vote. And this is just the type of race that can be impacted by the Tea Party movement. Right now this race projects as a
Weak DEM Hold, but it exudes the urge to flip to red by Election Day. However, if that is to be the case, Madeira or Tom Marino, the
other possible nominee, will have to overcome a substantial financial deficit. Carney has $665,000 in the bank. Neither Madeira nor Marino has eclipsed six
figures yet in that department.
House District 11: Democrat incumbent Paul Kanjorski has faced Republican Lou Barletta before - twice, in fact. In 2002, Kanjorski won the first
match up with 56% of the vote. Six years later, the two butted heads again. This time, even while President Obama was garnering 57% of the vote in
the district, Kanjorski needed all the help he could get to make it to 52%. The climate has changed for round three, and, for Barletta, that could make all the
difference. Two factors to keep in mind as we move toward the primaries and then onto the general election. First, how much fight will Corey O'Brien,
Kanjorski's primary opponent exert on the incumbent, and, second, how effective will Barletta be in closing an enormous fundraising gap which Kanjorski now leads 6 to
1? Time will tell, of course, but for now this race is classified as a Weak DEM Hold.
House District 12: The late John Murtha's unexpected passing has left this seat open and very much in play. At a Cook PVI of R+1, this district is
about as balanced as you can get. However, the coincidence of the special election to fill Murtha's seat with the statewide primary on May 18 may help Democrats
retain it. That's because in Pennsylvania's closed primary format, the Democrats' 2-1 edge in voter registration here provides them with a structural turnout
advantage. Yet, polls and pundit ratings would give the GOP a slight edge right now with Republican nominee Tim Burns leading the Democrats' pick Mark Critz by 3
in Public Policy Polling's mid-April survey. In light of that, the projection for the special election is a Weak GOP Gain. Given
the potential for Democratic turnout to be higher proportionally for this special election than they can expect to see in November, if they do lose the seat in 3 weeks, it will be a
very difficult task to take it back in 6 months. On the other hand, if Critz is victorious, this district is sure to land right back on the highly-vulnerable list once the
special election dust settles.
House District 15: At first glance, Bethlehem Mayor John Callahan appears to sit in an unusually strong position as a congressional challenger. He is
the party's first choice to run against the Republican incumbent in a district which boasts a slight Democratic lean, and his cash on hand outpaces the incumbent by $6000 -
something almost unheard of this early in a congressional race. Yet, the projection for this race is not all that close. Callahan's main problem is an issue of
timing. Had he contested for this seat two years ago, he would no doubt be poised to win it. This year, however, the climate just doesn't suit Democratic candidates
who have a penchant for raising taxes. (As Bethlehem mayor, he advocated a 17% increase in the local sales tax.) Illustrating voter sentiment, a
January poll conducted for incumbent Charlie Dent's campaign shows Dent with an overwhelming 53% to 27% lead over Callahan. Yes, this is a partisan poll, but
Callahan's climb is undeniably substantial even with the positives he has going for him. The opening projection is a Mod GOP Hold for
Dent. While this race could tighten, if could also widen if Callahan cannot counter the tax and spend mantle Dent is sure to try to pin on him.
House District 17: After re-districting gave this district a much stronger Republican lean, Democratic incumbent Tim Holden should have had a difficult,
if not impossible, challenge holding onto the House seat here. Instead, Holden has used a conservative voting record and strong personal ties to the more Republican
areas of the district to win the last several elections without any trouble - he claimed 64% of the vote here while President Obama could manage just 48%. Republicans
attribute his easy re-elections to a lack of formidable challengers, a shortcoming they think they can remedy this cycle. State Senator Dave Argull, they believe, can be
the threat Holden has not yet faced, and his strength is enhanced by the prevailing political winds. It remains to be seen if voters in the district will forgive him for
voting in his current job for an unpopular legislative pay raise, a move for which he has since apologized. Pundits appear to view Argull's candidacy in a positive light,
rating this race as competitive even considering Holden's previous overwhelming victories. Based on those sentiments, I rate this race a Mod
DEM Hold.
The Pennsylvania state page is one resource you'll want to take full advantage of.
Next stop: Rhode Island
Filed under:
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
PA House
PA Governor
posted by Scott Elliott at 6:51pm 04/25/10::
link
|
| Saturday, April 24, 2010 |
|---|
| Fifty state tour - Pennsylvania preview (part 1) |
If you had to choose one state to focus on for the 2010 election cycle, Pennsylvania would be the best choice. If there is a red wave on the horizon, it could be a
tsunami in the Keystone State. Both the Senate race and the Governor's race are very much in play here, and an astonishing 10 of 19 total House seats are too.
After enjoying a high level of success in Pennsylvania over the last several election cycles - they've picked the governorship, both Senate seats and 5 House seats since 2000
- Democrats face a potential backlash that could cost them many of their recent gains.
Senate: As a former Republican, Arlen Specter cannot be happy with his current situation. Seeing easier access to power and a less doubtful path to
re-election, Specter granted the Democrats a then-filibuster-proof majority in the Senate by switching parties last April. That move, in his mind I'm sure, should have made
another term a strong likelihood for him. (At that time, he was trailing badly to his primary opponent Pat Toomey.) Unfortunately for him, the switcharoo did not work as he
had planned. Instead of breezing to another term against Toomey in the general election, he's now facing a strong primary challenge from within his new party in
Congressman Joe Sestak - and he continues to trail Toomey in the polls. Sestak's fortunes have faded a bit here lately, so it looks like Specter will at least win the
nomination. Once he gets to the general, though, I've become more convinced with each passing poll that Toomey can actually beat him. That sentiment is
reflected in the Weak GOP Gain projection I'm giving this race to start.
Governor: Any misgivings I have about Pennsylvania's willingness to elect a Republican to statewide office (i.e. Toomey beating Specter) is somewhat
allayed by the current outlook in this race. It appears at the moment that outgoing Democratic Governor Ed Rendell will take the (D) with him as he leaves. That's
because State Attorney General Tom Corbett, the presumptive GOP nominee, leads all Democratic contenders by double-digits in the polls. His closest rival is Dan
Onorato, an Allegheny county executive. That's good news for Democrats as he is also the front runner for the nomination. Corbett's strength in the polls is
another demonstration of what may be in store for the Democrats nationwide come November. In what should be at worst an even-money race for them, this contest is
projected as a Weak GOP Gain, and it could be argued that projection is calling it too close.
House District 3: In a classic partisan wave victory, Democrat Kathy Dahlkemper defeated incumbent GOP Congressman Phil English in 2008. In
2010, the classic power of incumbency gives her a good early position in her quest to keep the seat. If the current political climate did not favor the GOP, she would
probably coast to victory. That, however, is not the case, and she does face a rocky road to re-election. Republicans Paul Huber and Mike Kelly are
self-fundable candidates who can give Dahlkemper a run for her money. Either could win the nomination, and either would point to Dahlkemper's Obamacare
cave in the general election. Like Bart Stupak, she changed her vote from no to yes at the last minute. That decision alone brings her race into play. Time will tell if the
eventual GOP nominee can tighten this race from its current Mod DEM Hold rating.
House District 4: This district claims a Cook PVI rating of R+6, and Democratic incumbent Jason Altmire has won two elections here during Democratic wave years. Given those facts, one might expect this seat to be imminently vulnerable for the blue team. While it is certainly in play, it is not, however, on anyone's short list of
probable GOP takeovers. Sure, the GOP might win here if the Republican wave is of tidal proportions, but Altmire has sticking power this year due to the fact that he has nearly $1.2
million on hand - and no formidable Republicans challenging him. For the moment, this race is a Mod DEM Hold, though it's a coin flip as to whether it even
stays on Election Projection's tracking list.
House District 6: With his less-than-stellar conservative voting record, GOP incumbent Jim Gerlach isn't particularly well-liked in purist conservative circles, and he has
biennially had a major target on his back fastened by Democrats eager to get rid of him. Nevertheless, he keeps on winning elections - even in huge Democratic cycles. Last
year, Democrats appeared to finally get their wish as he opted to run for governor. That plan soon changed, and in January he announced his intent to run for re-election to his
House seat. His change of heart had a profound effect on this race. As Charlie Cook observes, "ever since Gerlach abandoned his run for governor and filed for re-election,
Democrats have been a total mess." And though he trails mightily against wealthy Democrat Doug Pike in fundraising, Cook attributes that to his "gubernatorial detour" and says
"come the fall, Gerlach should have the money he needs to make his case." With that in mind, this race has moved from likely Democratic pickup without him in the race to lean and
now likely GOP retention since he's jumped back in. We'll see how long the current Mod GOP Hold rating lasts, or if the prevailing trend eventually removes
him from the vulnerable list altogether.
That's enough for this first installment. In this pivotal state, we still have seven more competitive House races to go. I'll cover the rest in the next post.
Filed under:
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
PA House
PA Governor
posted by Scott Elliott at 10:00pm 04/24/10::
link
|
| Wednesday, January 27, 2010 |
|---|
| Rating Change: Latest poll flips PA senate race |
Republican Pat Toomey is benefiting from the damage sustained to the Democrats over the last year. Several polls in recent weeks have shown him near or ahead of Traitor Arlen
Specter and Democrat Joe Sestak. Today, however, comes
this poll from Franklin & Marshall reporting that, among likely voters, Toomey is up by
fourteen points against Specter and even more against Sestak. That's too much advantage for Election Projection to leave this race in the blue column.
So, the Pennsylvania Senate race becomes the 6 sixth projected GOP pickup - not counting Brown's victory in Massachusetts last week and moves the projected Senate tally to 51
Democrats, 47 Republicans and 2 Independents. The next 5 takeovers needed to regain the Senate majority will be much more difficult to come by for the GOP. Yes, there's a
big red wave brewing but, unlike the House where the GOP has a decent shot at power, the odds of taking the Senate remain very low, probably around 10% in my estimation.
Filed under:
Ratings changes
Senate
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
posted by Scott Elliott at 5:58pm 01/27/10::
link
|
| Thursday, August 13, 2009 |
|---|
| PA shocker: Toomey leads Specter by 12 |
I know it's a long way out, but the latest poll released by Rasmussen out of Pennsylvania gives Republican Pat Toomey a 12-point lead over turncoat
Democratic incumbent Arlen Specter. Michael Barone calls it
an "earthquake," and I
guess, considering the previous Rasmussen poll had Specter ahead by 11, that's about right. Nevertheless, I would also lay on all the caveats he does.
|
Let me enter here all the usual and appropriate caveats. This is one poll; others may not show similar movement. Rasmussen's likely voter screen tends to produce somewhat more pro-Republican
results than other pollsters. The poll was taken while Specter was getting lots of back talk in town hall meetings. We're 15 months away from the election. Toomey is not known in depth by most voters.
|
You should go read
what else he has to say.
Filed under:
Senate
Pennsylvania
PA Senate
posted by Scott Elliott at 9:55pm 08/13/09 ::
link
|
|
| Election Projection Resources |
EP's RSS Feed |
RSS
|
| 2010 Projection Results |
|
| 2008 Projection Results |
|
| 2006 Projection Results |
|
| 2004 Projection Results |
|
| Search this site |
provided by Google
|
| Contact Me |
e-mail Scott at: thebloggingcaesar -at- yahoo.com
|
|
|